Zombie Virus. 2.0

@Deleted User yeah, about 99 percent

I'm not saying condoms are totally ineffective at preventing HIV from intercourse.

@Deleted User It'd be weird if it didn't

<:GWqlabsKek:393085130219978752>

dem dang periods

perioids

I'm saying they're not a surefire safety.

Most isn't surefire...so don't go around banging Aids Monkeys.

^^^

It's a very bad thought that we've seen shared in the common culture that as long as you wear a condom everything is 100% fine.

Or being banged by them hehe..

It's just WRONG.

@Grodd there is no perfect barrier if you still want to have sex

It's purely taste

There is a perfect barrier though.

It's called not having sex.

yes, marriage cures all stds

Not everybody can hold it

oh <:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>

you meant abstinence

that's gay tho

@[[[ Grodd ]]] "if you still want to have sex"

Read, motherfucker

I was just about to fuck an hiv carrying monkey

<:pepe_eyes:378719408362881024>

Marriage doesn't cure STDs but as long as both partners are clean and don't cheat they are assured safe sex.

Well, I mean NOT having sex is technically what you can easily do when not socially engaged with others.

Only having sex with non-degenerates could be quite helpfull to prevent anything else.

Angry Canadian <:pepe_eyes:378719408362881024>

good think that ya's told me not to

what about two clean unmarried people

why is it wrong in your opinion for them to have sex

@Grodd unfortunately, marriage is less reliable than condoms now for STD transmission

if they don't contract anything

Purely cosmetic

There are other reasons for that Shrekko.

condoms are purely cosmetic <:think_woke:378717098681171988>

Mostly because of the first two presumptions you made

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

Betsie is disapoint. she aint get none

apparently there are glow-in-the-dark condoms

Yes