https://twitter.com/markantro/status/1122203743221628928

Rip UKIP

<:pepehands:378719408367075333>

BOOOOOO! I know this woman

She's actual stereotype middle class hippy mom

Imagine supporting the literal CUK party.

"i'm behind the CUKs"
"CUKs are the way to go"
"Yes, my wife is very close with a tall black man, why do you ask?"

oh and she has hairy armpits

https://youtu.be/hKztMUdO3gc the nicest thing ever

Respectable not forced at all super serious

We need more Carls in power

https://twitter.com/DylanPGriswold/status/1121506690644365312?s=19

<:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>

Anti-natalism

I mean they're not wrong.

A fetus is a literal parasite.

No, a parasite is a different species

Not necessarily.

Carrying a fetus is the literal purpose of an organism

It is AN organism that lives on ir in a host organism and gets its food from or at expense of the host.

Oh get the fuck out of here

Yes, a fetus is part of reproduction and usually desired.

But it is by definition a parasite.

🤔

No, you're just being pedantic for the sake of an anti-natalist narrative

Wrong.

I'm being pedantic for the sake of being a dick.

`In evolutionary biology, parasitism is a relationship between species, where one organism, the parasite, lives on or in another organism, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life.`

Between species

Libtard begone

You're widening the Definition of a word in order to encompass a parallel phenomenon in order to win an argument

Does not say they have to be necessarily different species.

I'm not widening the definition at all. The definition of a parasite is based on function. A fetus is functionally a parasite.

I'm not saying that's a bad thing.

No, it is functionally a fetus

That is true.

And a fetus is functionally a parasite.

That doesn't mean it's bad.

You're diluting the concept to an overly simplistic one