Message from @Gaius Musonius Rufus
Discord ID: 573005203385876481
Again. Scale is important. Lets go back a short bit 200 years (again this is a fraction of what we must look at for even moderate variation in traits with very high drive). 1819. TFR is more than double current rate violence more than quadruple and marriage rates off the chart. there is no way (yes even for HUWITE rates) for that to be a genetic change. Yet when you see a much smaller differential on ethic lines you are somehow certain thaat it is.
TFR?
Total Fertility Rate. It seems an odd metric but it is really really important when looking at population genetics.
Or economic development really. There is an inverse correlation between TFR and per-capita GDP/PPP if you are into foreign investment it's a great metric for targeting markets.
And I'm not forgetting Neanderthal, Denisovian, nor Naledi for that matter. At this point we are talking aa common ancestor 1-1.5M years ago. And the genetic contribution is minimal. Remember we are not talking 5% we are talking 5% *of the variation*
Denisovian interbred as recently as 13,000 years ago most likely
Possibly. Again extending that to some grand phenotypical expression is absurd. Especially when we can observe greater variation on a much shorter timeline.
I am in fact rather interested in paleogenetics. And I can assure you nobody who studies this considers the RR hypothesis plausible.
lol Probably because they're university cucks
Yeah. That's it. A vast conspiracy to deny internet autists the right to enjoy the pride they get from "muh ancestors"
Bravely opposed by an underground who knows fuckall about genetics or evolution.....
from what i've read, asians have more than whites, and not the same portions necessarily either
and they coincidentally have higher brain volumes and average IQ
or, possibly not coincidentally
Sargon Possible a Pedophile According to Dailymail - https://youtu.be/HGk5NQSqKmM
like i think east asians have up to 8% or so from neanderthals
quite a lot of room for mutations there
@Fitzydog `It's highly unlikely that their DNA only attributed to our skin color or facial structure lol`
hmmmm
yes quite
Ancap baller
<:high_iq:382980759012638731>
<:high_iq:382980759012638731>
LOLOLOLOLOL . . . O'Brien doing a massive back-pedal on Corbyn this morning for fear of being associated with anti-Semitism regarding foreword to that book from 1905.
Ah the Left eating their own
Jeremy the Messiah can do nothing wrong comrades
the left is being the left
turn around, break their neck and kiss their own ass
Quick everybody, there's a climate emergency...
...Anti-Semitism? Don't know what you mean
Them comparing it to a state of war is retarded too
<:oof:494878589406150657>
https://twitter.com/PaulEmbery/status/1123472776764035072
SPY WHALES!
I can't wait for the movie franchise.
I think it might be an entire panel of NPCs today...
https://twitter.com/BBCNewsPR/status/1123522611999322113
Not even a Michelle to stare at