Looks like we've hit peak AnCap

*readies mcnuke*

Here's your 9.99

N

https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1131004577778675714?s=19

<:high_iq:382980759012638731>

@Fitzydog if women are property and property can be damaged and rape damages women, what is the property damage for rape?

idk, have you tried arbitration yet?

https://twitter.com/yhazony/status/1130574657948737536?s=19

<:high_iq:382980759012638731>

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/may/22/nevada-senate-passes-national-popular-vote-bill-pa/?234

@Legiondude she's right you know

https://i.redd.it/w9ejksgj2nz21.jpg

https://i.redd.it/z34ldvjb4nz21.jpg

What kind of boomer fucking font are you using?

Can people actually read like this

I guess?

I only see old Boomers use this

Not my screen 🤷🏿

You ageist bigots

@SomeUser27 As soon as you start treating people as individuals, you are INHERENTLY treating them unequally

The black kid who stole bread from a store doesn't get the same sentence as the politician who stole bread

Yes and no, it’s the context of it like if someone has mental disabilities we say that can’t make their own decisions

Not by design but sure

https://screenshots.firefox.com/WN0L60FjegWTbJql/www.bbc.co.uk

I’m for laws being enforced correctly rather then based on class

@Ondsinet I'm not talking about design

But context does matter which is why we have judges and not computers giving sentences

@Fitzydog yeah I mean, the state should treat everyone the same but you can't stomp corruption

@SomeUser27 I find it to be unjust, and unfair, to treat everyone at the same standard.

People are not cookie cutters

Define the same standard?

Like I think you mean something different from me

I just gave an example, and now I'm arguing against two people

@Fitzydog but my point always stands, who gets to decide who you treat differently?

Oh I'm not arguing yet I'm trying to understand your position sorry

Same here,

@Ondsinet By its very nature, treating people different based on GROUP (which is what you just said) is bad

If you're deciding ahead of time, you're already fucking up

I'm arguing for the dynamic justice system we already have

Yah context matters, kind of like murder and self defense

You can kill in self defense but it’s not murder

And I'm arguing that it is NOT equal, and you do NOT want equality in that sense.