I disagree with that. There are rights that are intrinsically given to all poeples and ought to be. Rights that have to be constantly defended by force to enforce them is falling into barbarism, where there is no established covenant or charter of laws. Laws are decided and established by societies and are followed. Furthermore, moving into another territory is not a violent matter.

It only becomes a violent matter when the people of the host country become hostile to the movement, where you see the rights of one group infringe the rights of another

@Fitzydog I know many people in Texas that want to freely associate with Mexicans. If freedom of association is so important for your why are you stopping theirs?

Also free speech past government censorship is a spook

You can never protect all speech equality because some speech stops other forms of speech

@StevenStevens Because many people in Texas do NOT want to freely associate.

In this case, I would advise splitting it up.

But also, this new group of Mexicans from down south were introduced into the state against the will of the original inhabitants of Texas starting in the 60s

So we're back to square one of a centralized authority making decisions for a group of people against their will via the use of force

Well if two people want to associate with each other i don't see why you being against it should matter at all.

A centralised authority which was voted into power

If we are talking about "Original inhabitants" of mexico there will be loads of people leaving the US

@Capitán Alatriste Which gave itself extra powers that were not granted to it by the people, and made decisions on behalf of people against the purpose of their office.

Just because an authority has a power does not make that power legitimate or ethical

@StevenStevens go take an 8val test and show us how much of a fag you really are

Do ittttt

Post in <#586454472138555392>

Political campasses

Y I K E R S

either way i'm a right lib

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Prove it

Can't post there buddy

or post images

Well, from now until then you will be known as communist scum

People that unironically think that political tests say something about politics

YIKERS

post it on imgur and link it

rarted

I pmed it to the retard

They're a close enough metric

No they arent

an ancom and an anarcho egoist get similar results

When both ideologies are very different

It only gives a close enough metric on the liberal spectrum

They're both the same, with different dictionaries and more sophistry

anything outside of it, it breaks down

wow, someone has left leaning ideas ............. *must be a communist*

literally NPC mentality

Anarchy-egoism is a fucking meme dude.

Like anarcho monarchism

or anarcho fascism

"Anarchy-egoism"

That too lol