I dont want multiple law systems in the same place you know

Ours don't do that here

Oh?

The police come and are the ones to take the people to the jail after the security company subdues the person

Oh that's what you mean

or if its violent the police are the ones to take the person to the morgue yadda yadda

yeah

but like if all the private corps were a thing, but only one court. then sure. I could imagine that working.

Why though? What's the difference?

We contract out our road construction.

We contract out ambulances.

because companies are harder to root out corruption from

Lol wut

Nigga you're delusional or young

Or you believe people are too good. If you pay off someone from a private corp, who's gonna stop him?

You just said that there should be no police. So the police cant do anything against the corruption.

Whilst in a government institution its easier to manage.

You think they operate in a vacuum.

You need to drop that

The police itself becomes the corruption

You don't need to root out corruption, just choose another company.

^

Or sue them

Then you get to the problem where all the companies do the same thing. @-5K-

who chooses the company?

Coca Cola death squads killing pepsi terrorists 😎

@Capitán Alatriste I do? Or the business?

Just check on the american internet oligopoli

the individual or the town (mayor) ?

@MountainMan That's a byproduct of our govt btw

@Capitán Alatriste I'm thinking like individual streets tbh

So extremely localised

@Capitán Alatriste Do all the malls in your town have the same security?

what happens when you walk out of the "jurisdiction" of this private company?

you can't rely on the competition for help

they'll just see you get mugged and drive away

That doesn't make sense

Why not?

You forgot to pay up your Human Rights subscription... Sorry liberal <:kermit_spree:378719408438116352>

It would be easier to start a private security company though than an internet infrastructure company. More competitors would be available so the chance that these companies form a corrupt oligopoly would be lower

The person paying the security company is the PROPERTY OWNER.

The property owner is accepting the responsibility of safety of all customers

So the company is under contractual obligation to stop mugging on its property

But what if the crime happens outside of the property, or are you considering the person *property*?

It's still someone's property