lol

thought so

The only connection I see between the 'Alt-Right' and 'The Right', is "Muh racism!!".

Then between the two they could be center to mid left like hitler was

eh they fall *right* because of the mislabeling of hitler as right

@Fitzydog the racial aristocracy

because *he cant be socialist!*

By this logic, and ANC and EFF in South Africa are "Right wing"

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki Third way kinda does not fall inot traditional left-right spectrum

So would BLM, Black Panthers, ect

@franti It doesn't, but it sure as hell is more closely related to classic Fascism and Socialism

Like Nazbol?

It is perversed socialism/Fascism. He too musilinis Facism which was heavily socialist and reengineered it. That is why Nazi party was mid to center left instead of mid left like Musilinis Nationalist party.

Spain as well

And why musilini himself told Hitler he wasnt facist enough

Spain used musilinis model almost to the t

And lasted till what 80s or 90s?

Yeah, there abouts

Ironically all 3 were reactionary to communist movements in their countries

Are there even any right-wing, universal ethics, authoritarian govts?

And ours pop out of the woodworks soon after antifa and communist do here. hm?<:think_globalist:378717098945544192>

I would say penochet was center right

he was still capitalist, and held some right wing ideals

What do you deam universal ethics?

As soon as you start trying to control the behavior of the populace, you automatically also extend that to economics, which pushes you towards the Left

The only real thing penochet controlled was fighting communism/socialism

Universal ethics are a singular system for all people, contrary to Dualistic like Germans vs Jews, Muslims vs Kaffir, etc

That doesnt exist in any nation. There is always an in and out group. Be it parties, people, classes, ideologies

The only time there isnt duality is if one group has total and undeniable control, and even then there is some.

No, I meant institutionally.

Well seeing as when authoritarian kicks in, the out group is a threat to the sitting group, it is natural for it to become institutional

Yeah, see what I mean? It just devolves towards total control of the market and society

market not so much. But society yes, due to removing threats

But capitalist authoritarian regimes have existed

Where? How do you allow the market to operate, if you're trying to exert control?

Penochet again. And its easy

If you have such a social command that the economy doesnt need the control

Hmm... alright

Either way, Nazis are lefties.

oh yea

they economically were socialist before the war and psuedo socialist after the *privatization* everyone talks about. Where hitler privatized to gov croneys so really kept control