Message from @Goblin_Slayer_Floki
Discord ID: 477969867320852480
Thats usually under monarchy as a form of fuedalism
Of course racism isnt just right wing
A look at those african socislist is enough to get it
No, that's what the white ethno-nationalists are supporting
The white ethnonationalista are edgyboys.
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki Regardless, their social policies, and economic policies, are both very socialist
but they also support socialist programs right?
lol
thought so
The only connection I see between the 'Alt-Right' and 'The Right', is "Muh racism!!".
Then between the two they could be center to mid left like hitler was
eh they fall *right* because of the mislabeling of hitler as right
because *he cant be socialist!*
By this logic, and ANC and EFF in South Africa are "Right wing"
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki Third way kinda does not fall inot traditional left-right spectrum
So would BLM, Black Panthers, ect
@franti It doesn't, but it sure as hell is more closely related to classic Fascism and Socialism
Like Nazbol?
It is perversed socialism/Fascism. He too musilinis Facism which was heavily socialist and reengineered it. That is why Nazi party was mid to center left instead of mid left like Musilinis Nationalist party.
Spain as well
Spain used musilinis model almost to the t
And lasted till what 80s or 90s?
Yeah, there abouts
Ironically all 3 were reactionary to communist movements in their countries
Are there even any right-wing, universal ethics, authoritarian govts?
And ours pop out of the woodworks soon after antifa and communist do here. hm?<:think_globalist:378717098945544192>
I would say penochet was center right
he was still capitalist, and held some right wing ideals
What do you deam universal ethics?
As soon as you start trying to control the behavior of the populace, you automatically also extend that to economics, which pushes you towards the Left
The only real thing penochet controlled was fighting communism/socialism
Universal ethics are a singular system for all people, contrary to Dualistic like Germans vs Jews, Muslims vs Kaffir, etc
That doesnt exist in any nation. There is always an in and out group. Be it parties, people, classes, ideologies
The only time there isnt duality is if one group has total and undeniable control, and even then there is some.
No, I meant institutionally.
Well seeing as when authoritarian kicks in, the out group is a threat to the sitting group, it is natural for it to become institutional
Yeah, see what I mean? It just devolves towards total control of the market and society
market not so much. But society yes, due to removing threats
But capitalist authoritarian regimes have existed
Where? How do you allow the market to operate, if you're trying to exert control?