Message from @Cody

Discord ID: 572163534084112384


2019-04-28 20:46:42 UTC  

No i don't

2019-04-28 20:46:58 UTC  

It is textbook smearing his reputation using out of context/out of date events.

2019-04-28 20:47:08 UTC  

???

2019-04-28 20:48:27 UTC  

At the time sargon believed the age of consent was for the average, but that there could maybe be a situation where a child could consent, but that the law couldn't allow for it regardless.

2019-04-28 20:48:59 UTC  

Whoever posted made that tweet why did they wait all this time and only "came forward" with it after Carl had announced he was running as a member of UKIP?

2019-04-28 20:49:11 UTC  

So even back then he wasn't defending pedos

2019-04-28 20:49:35 UTC  

Tbf it was while he was talking to someone who believed what happened with him was ok

2019-04-28 20:50:17 UTC  

So even the rape victim was in agreement

2019-04-28 20:50:20 UTC  

?!?!?!?!?!?!

2019-04-28 20:50:25 UTC  

SARGON MAN BAD

2019-04-28 20:50:26 UTC  

Wtf

2019-04-28 20:50:46 UTC  

**YOU SEE HOW THIS LOOKS?**

2019-04-28 20:51:13 UTC  

Yeah the rape victim was ok with being raped

2019-04-28 20:51:54 UTC  

I think you're experiencing what is known as "cope"

2019-04-28 20:52:01 UTC  

No

2019-04-28 20:52:09 UTC  

You're just losing it

2019-04-28 20:52:15 UTC  

It's a simply term

2019-04-28 20:52:17 UTC  

Retarded

2019-04-28 20:52:49 UTC  

Do you agree the tweet is slander? Smearing at best?

2019-04-28 20:53:21 UTC  

You can talk about the greater effect of discuss the matter further but that's what I'm most interested in

2019-04-28 20:53:36 UTC  

You shouldn't be

2019-04-28 20:53:44 UTC  

So sargon was in agreement with the rape victim

2019-04-28 20:53:46 UTC  

It doesn't matter

2019-04-28 20:53:50 UTC  

Not the rapist

2019-04-28 20:53:56 UTC  

But he's a rape apologist

2019-04-28 20:53:59 UTC  

<:what:382980756139409409>

2019-04-28 20:54:11 UTC  

wut

2019-04-28 20:54:42 UTC  

You're making no sense man

2019-04-28 20:55:52 UTC  

Let's move this to somewhere else if u want to continue <#372513679964635138>

2019-04-28 20:57:56 UTC  

how do you agree with a rape victim and not the rapist when the rapist and rape victim agree

2019-04-28 20:58:30 UTC  

I guess it's really more of a philisophical distinction

2019-04-28 20:58:53 UTC  

What would Nietzche think?

2019-04-28 20:59:08 UTC  

Like I said thats another broader discussion

2019-04-28 20:59:57 UTC  

The tweet is malicious slander and only meant to smear him and imply that he believes in things that he most certainly does not.

2019-04-28 21:00:53 UTC  

"He condoned the rape of 9 year oldS"

2019-04-28 21:01:19 UTC  

Maybe, but it's an understandable forseeable consequence of saying retarded things, and then running for office

2019-04-28 21:01:20 UTC  

He couldn't have if he believed which we know he did in the age of consent 16-18

2019-04-28 21:02:06 UTC  

You disagree with him on a philosophical level and you acknowledge that his "retardation" has no effect in the real world

2019-04-28 21:02:36 UTC  

He wants to raise the age of consent to 18. FIN

2019-04-28 21:04:29 UTC  

You can not make a rational/logical/pragmatic call to give the green light and tweet "HE CONDONS THE RAPE OF 9 YEAR OLDS ALL NINE YEAR OLDS!!!"

2019-04-28 21:05:20 UTC  

It don't make no sense you a dirty dirty smear merchant <:trumped:440551399772913674>