???

<:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>

He was being agreeable with a man who said he consented to sex with a man when he was a child

Because he was dumb and weak

He could be changing as a person, but no one is really smearing him

He's still advocating to raise the age of consent to 18.

That's cool

What the tweet posted after the podcast

Or recently

If recently that's after he has literally officially announced he will raise the age of consent to 18.

You see the problem

No i don't

It is textbook smearing his reputation using out of context/out of date events.

???

At the time sargon believed the age of consent was for the average, but that there could maybe be a situation where a child could consent, but that the law couldn't allow for it regardless.

Whoever posted made that tweet why did they wait all this time and only "came forward" with it after Carl had announced he was running as a member of UKIP?

So even back then he wasn't defending pedos

Tbf it was while he was talking to someone who believed what happened with him was ok

So even the rape victim was in agreement

?!?!?!?!?!?!

SARGON MAN BAD

Wtf

**YOU SEE HOW THIS LOOKS?**

Yeah the rape victim was ok with being raped

I think you're experiencing what is known as "cope"

No

You're just losing it

It's a simply term

Retarded

Do you agree the tweet is slander? Smearing at best?

You can talk about the greater effect of discuss the matter further but that's what I'm most interested in

You shouldn't be

So sargon was in agreement with the rape victim

It doesn't matter

Not the rapist

But he's a rape apologist

<:what:382980756139409409>

wut

You're making no sense man

Let's move this to somewhere else if u want to continue <#372513679964635138>

how do you agree with a rape victim and not the rapist when the rapist and rape victim agree