Well my Freedom of Speech says I wouldn't make that tweet

That's edgy as fuck and he just sits there all innocent and says. I didn't realise

```I absolutely defend the right of free speech```
```But```

one follows the other as sure as night follows day

I wouldn't fire Danny, I'd let him hang out to dry. Great for ratings

I also wouldn't fire Danny I would instead insist that every time the baby is mentioned on the BBC his race must be pointed out too so that no one ever forgets and this terrible racist mistake will never be made again

He's on everything but the BBC this morning

Giving them all the clicks

I'd make Danny do a 3hr evening call in show

He shouldnt have got fired. Getting flamed by almost everyone is a suitable punishment enough lmao.

https://lfpress.com/news/local-news/nominee-for-peoples-party-candidacy-says-he-was-booted-for-being-gay/amp

https://lfpress.com/news/local-news/peoples-party-denies-oxford-candidate-dumped-for-being-gay

To all my canuckanons here

Context matters when we do it...
https://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/james-obrien/danny-bakers-first-interview-since-being-sacked-by/

This is the best way to make the point

Keep in mind. They think they have the moral high ground

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/huawei-and-the-cameron-connection/

"Yes, let’s be realistic: May’s government has chosen – in opposition to the rest of the Five Eyes alliance – in favour of Huawei’s involvement in Britain’s 5G, while her government was being lobbied by the May administration’s predecessors who are now employed by Huawei or lobbying for more Chinese investment. Yes, May has put Chinese investment before British security, but so did her predecessors."

She's just using her position to make money before she bogs off to Dubai

https://twitter.com/RAZ0RFIST/status/1126425531543482369

What's that a reference to? @Broo TulsiGang 2024 🇬🇧 🇺🇸

Disney bought Vice for $400M or something like that

And now they regret paying so much

Who would if they actually read their shite?

I Wouldn't pay that for Vice when it was good

They paid WHAT?

they paid actual money

Fucking hell, that's how you know you're too rich.

but if you are rich you can pay people to do analysis

Even for name recognition it isn't worth 2 mil

MAYBE 1 mil kf you sack all the POS in there and replace them.

But that's an investment for the long term, they'd have to rebuild a tarnished reputation.

I think it can be done, but you can just as easily make a new company

Disney should give Tim funding for Subverse.

but Tim isn't WOKE

But he will make them money

What if the goal in buying vice is to use their name to redpill lefties who still trust it?

If they give Tim money The Mouse will make sure he's woke

His ratings are higher than CNN

Thjey don't need money fool

They need to get Trump out of the White House so they can get POWER

Disney? No. Disney wants money. Politics just gets them some.

They don't need many of their current IP claims to make a fraction of what they make today, yet they get patent laws extended, why? For those extra millions in royalties.

They pinch pennies.