Message from @Trebjonn

Discord ID: 427411000556519425


2018-03-25 10:12:02 UTC  

Proposition: Veganism logically follows from bootstrapping moral value towards humans and is a moral position. Nonveganism contradicts a belief in human moral value and is an immoral position.

2018-03-25 10:12:44 UTC  

The bro had gone to sleep for now.

2018-03-25 10:13:04 UTC  

Just looking for some future debate.

2018-03-25 10:13:11 UTC  

we are carnivorous animals, i am happy to end the debate there

2018-03-25 10:13:41 UTC  

I spy a Charlie Kirk tweet...

2018-03-25 10:13:58 UTC  

Honestly, a Yes/No answer is what I'm looking for.

2018-03-25 10:14:15 UTC  

Not a retarded claim on our biological nature.

2018-03-25 10:15:44 UTC  

I am all for veganism when we can perfectly clone meat for everyone on the planet

2018-03-25 10:15:57 UTC  

Tasty meat

2018-03-25 10:16:29 UTC  

I am all for veganism when we can perfectly clone everyone on the planet for meat

2018-03-25 10:16:36 UTC  

<:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

2018-03-25 10:16:41 UTC  

That's not a moral argument for the non vegan position @nic

2018-03-25 10:16:58 UTC  

Of course it's not, it's a shitpost you absolute unit

2018-03-25 10:17:15 UTC  

Who wants the debate?

2018-03-25 10:17:21 UTC  

Nonveganism is as immoral a position as not contributing to the field of researching synthetic meats.

2018-03-25 10:17:52 UTC  

Absolute cancer.

2018-03-25 10:17:56 UTC  

For the time being the nonveganism is a necesity for large part of the population that need nutrients

2018-03-25 10:17:57 UTC  

Anyone want the debate?

2018-03-25 10:18:16 UTC  

@Trebjonn Incorrect .

2018-03-25 10:18:22 UTC  

Who wants the debate?

2018-03-25 10:18:43 UTC  

the vegan diet is not suitable for everyone on the earth

2018-03-25 10:18:54 UTC  

or economically feasible

2018-03-25 10:19:18 UTC  

So you're asking for input on a debate, and you're calling everyone's responses cancer and incorrect.

2018-03-25 10:19:25 UTC  

Trebjonn is correct here

2018-03-25 10:19:27 UTC  

1st argument is incorrect 2nd argument isn't an argument that can demonstrate your position as moral.

2018-03-25 10:19:31 UTC  

No he isn't.

2018-03-25 10:19:52 UTC  

So you would rather people starve or get malnutrition?

2018-03-25 10:20:01 UTC  

I'm looking for someone to accept the proposition, take the con of the prop and debate.

2018-03-25 10:20:22 UTC  

Ok, if Trebjonn isn't correct, you need to do a bit more than say "no he isn't" to change my mind

2018-03-25 10:20:24 UTC  

@Trebjonn Appeal to futility fallacies aren't arguments .

2018-03-25 10:20:52 UTC  

Y needs to do X therefore X is justified in all contexts across the board.

2018-03-25 10:20:54 UTC  

Saying an argument isnt an argument without a counter argument

2018-03-25 10:21:31 UTC  

Its an appeal to futility.

2018-03-25 10:21:38 UTC  

Nobody wants the debate?

2018-03-25 10:22:17 UTC  

Your argument was an assertion and irrelevant to your position being moral/immoral

2018-03-25 10:22:54 UTC  

Are you willing to debate us?

2018-03-25 10:23:20 UTC  

2-3 letters plz

2018-03-25 10:24:00 UTC  

I'm not responding

2018-03-25 10:24:07 UTC  

Unless you'll debate on vv

2018-03-25 10:24:11 UTC  

Vc

2018-03-25 10:26:06 UTC  

who is "us"