Message from @Lexicon
Discord ID: 430632988372369409
Why should anyone care then?
so I don't think it's unreasonable to assume race realism would be much more widely accepted if it wasn't so politically censored. Indeed that is what we see outside of Western Europe and the US where racial egalitarian politics never caught on
What are you getting at? What's the point? Skip to the part where people get their rights stripped.
i just came to argue about statistics
How is this topic a thing Again!
Because lots of edgy chanfags are here
I think you'd find people are much more receptive to white nationalism if they know the truth. But it is neither necessary nor sufficient
Based on what?
Ethnonationalism is stupid
@Sarguns Even if it's all 100% correct, you can't do anything about it realistically
This just in, soy makes you more of a man.
I don't think soy boy is necessarily condemnation of soy
it's a way of calling a man estrogenic
The only people who care about race are all looking for an excuse to justify their own prejudices, it's ok to kick out blackie because we have some charts.
I live in a peaceful multicultural society and quite enjoy it
Soy is actually highly misunderstood by the public at large. Not all soy has the body fucking hormones. It's the ones that have been bred to resist drought and insects that mess with you
Most countries throughout history was ethnonationalist. America was founded on white nationalism and became the richest country on Earth under white nationalism. All of Europe was basically white nationalist until a few decades ago. Most other countries on Earth have strong racial identities. Most groups within first world countries have strong racial identities EXCEPT white.
Racial egalitarianism is a historically abnormal belief that caught on at a specific time and place in history. There's already evidence that whites are becoming more racially aware with time and it will probably not last. My beliefs are not weird or extreme, yours are. We've only had racial egalitarianism for a few decades and there's plenty of evidence it's not working. It certainly didn't work out in rhodesia, south africa, or arguably brazil
@Sarguns And now it's the 21st century when everyone is intermixed geographically. What now?
the irony is that a white ethnostate is retarded and therefore white people can't all be too bright now can they?
Argument from popularity; it doesn't matter how popular ethnonationalism is or was, that has no impact on it's validity.
The US simply isn't nor has it ever been an ethnostate
they aren't even that geographically mixed
Ethnonationalism doesn't even make sense historically in the US
Yeah tbh people gonna fuck tell them they can't won't work and you will never get enough to take it seriously enough to get an ethostate
Nothing from the founding fathers suggests they wanted whites only
america is more segregated today than during the 1950's, on a neighborhood by neighborhood level. People choose to live apart even with massive government efforts to stop it
I've decided that the most effective way to organize a society is by skin color, said no reasonably intelligent white man ever
Because of the welfare state and the ghettoization of culture, yes
the first act of congress was to restrict immigration to free white men of good character
Also why this issue there are bigger fish to fry.
@Sarguns oh herp derp, whites need to stick together...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Irish_sentiment
because it's edgy man
"Irish people prove racial egalitarianism will work, let's make more south africas!!!"
Literally what?
@Lexicon Because some people want to hide their racism behind psuedointellectualism
They are choosing to live apart due to class, not race