Message from @franti

Discord ID: 433598903779328002


2018-04-11 12:04:38 UTC  

I remember having friends in northern Israel during the whole Lebanon thing circa 2006

2018-04-11 12:04:43 UTC  

Yeah that's true.

2018-04-11 12:04:44 UTC  

that was fun.

2018-04-11 12:05:16 UTC  

I listen to InfoWars a lot, and I have to take a step back to understand their talking points vs my views on things. Listening to them daily got me into the routine of observing things from a distance.

2018-04-11 12:05:31 UTC  

erm

2018-04-11 12:05:32 UTC  

..

2018-04-11 12:05:34 UTC  

well..

2018-04-11 12:05:42 UTC  

..as long as you are also listening to other sources..

2018-04-11 12:05:46 UTC  

It's a good exercise.

2018-04-11 12:05:47 UTC  

I dont think the human mind can handle 15 hours of InfoWars a week

2018-04-11 12:05:47 UTC  

Yeah I do

2018-04-11 12:06:03 UTC  

I go through a lot. I like a lot of people who work for InfoWars.

2018-04-11 12:06:16 UTC  

I can easily differentiate their views from their research.

2018-04-11 12:06:31 UTC  

I've run into at least three people in the last week at work who.. sound like people who listen to too much infowars..

2018-04-11 12:06:38 UTC  

*a w k w a r d*

2018-04-11 12:06:42 UTC  

David Knight is a good guy

2018-04-11 12:06:47 UTC  

He was right about gay frogs 😄

2018-04-11 12:06:48 UTC  

Very opinionated, but not hiding it

2018-04-11 12:07:10 UTC  

Well, if I recall, the chemicals weren't changing the sexual orientation, but the actual sex of the frogs themselves

2018-04-11 12:07:12 UTC  

Owen is really hard to work with.

2018-04-11 12:07:14 UTC  

>be me
>be Assad
>some libcuck from America comes over
>Diplomat? More like dickplomat
>asks me "why do you need chemical weapons?"
>be me
>take a canister of sarin gas
>Cuck begins to sweat
>throw the canister at a city
>City begins to cough and die
>Triggering went better than expected
>Libturd from Jew York leaves, prepares for nuclear war
>I did it ironically though

2018-04-11 12:07:17 UTC  

actually the frogs thing is a good example

2018-04-11 12:07:30 UTC  

because they can take established information, but then extrapolate a conspiracy out of it

2018-04-11 12:07:42 UTC  

Yeah but Alex doesnt know if trap frogs are gay

2018-04-11 12:07:49 UTC  

like, the government deliberately putting chemicals into a pond to change the sex of an amphibian

2018-04-11 12:08:08 UTC  

instead of "chemicals were dumped in this area and, not surprisingly, had an adverse effect on the local fauna"

2018-04-11 12:08:10 UTC  

Is it like wormholes where gay is gravity, and too much gay rips a hole in the space-gay fabric?

2018-04-11 12:08:22 UTC  

I wonder what they thought of the EPA polluting that river

2018-04-11 12:08:37 UTC  

government incomptence or *government c o n s p i r a c y*

2018-04-11 12:08:53 UTC  

Reaps, have you ever looked into FDR's 600 words used for radio?

2018-04-11 12:08:56 UTC  

"ladies and gentlemen, this ia dry run by the EPA"

2018-04-11 12:09:01 UTC  

"They are testing us"

2018-04-11 12:09:34 UTC  

"eventually they will pollute all the rivers and use it as an excuse to pass legislation to force you to drink from government-approved water sources"

2018-04-11 12:09:40 UTC  

"these water sources will have chemicals in them"

2018-04-11 12:09:43 UTC  

"LIKE FLUORIDE"

2018-04-11 12:09:48 UTC  

I would not expect average listeners to know what the word 'fauna' means. You're more accurate, but you're not marketable..

2018-04-11 12:09:54 UTC  

"WHICH WILL MAKE YOU PASSIVEW AND OBENSIDIENT!!!"

2018-04-11 12:10:12 UTC  

IIRC he sad "chemicals that turn the frogs gay", not, chemicals *to* turn the frogs gay.
Of course im ridiculous to split hairs on such a topic

2018-04-11 12:10:46 UTC  

You can only work with what you're given, and Alex is a genius for marketing his brand.

2018-04-11 12:11:01 UTC  

He is definitely not dumb