Message from @Jab
Discord ID: 434802520678727681
It's possible but it's unlikely
all Assad does is deny everything as US propaganda
it's far more likely that it was either faked or done by the rebels rhemselves
and uh
easy job at that
given the sheer amounts of BS US propaganda out there
If the US has to intervene for every humanitarian crisis on the planet, we might as well be the global government.
Assad is not some benevolent leader
He's way better than the alternatives
AKA fucking islamists
but then again this is not a question of benevolence
those fucking islamists ðŸ˜
it's not about intervening in every humanitarian crises
this is a question of "why would Assad do something that benefits his opponents with a predictable outcome because it literally happened last year"
perhaps you're not familiar with chemical weapons
It's shameful to prioritize the wars abroad over our own.
The whole issue reeks
it's not that. NATO is supposed to be a defense against Russia. if Russia is defending a regime that is using chemical weapons, it makes perfect sense that there would be some kind of military action
Trump was right to have included France and the UK
"defense"
but w/e.
Why not assist?
or Help?
We are still a leader if we let the NATO states lead themselves from time to time.
Teach a man to fish ffs.
Trump didn't act too badly given this was basically a wristswat in order not to lose face
but the entire claim is BS
It reeks of back-room deals.
it's France and England's fuckery mainly, too
just like Libya was
that is what happened though, it was led by the US and involved UK and France. two very capable air forces
yep.
anyhow, off I go ack
What if it's 4d chess to trick the towelheads in Europe to do terrorism, and finally get citizens to boot them out?
It's interesting how the oil / gas pipelines always come into play when sanctions are thrown.
It's always padding more pressure economically between Eurasia and Europe.
"Crude" oil.
Might start calling it "Cruel oil"
It's energy. Can't do shit without energy.