Message from @Jab

Discord ID: 434802211466248202


2018-04-14 19:45:51 UTC  

Not with a won war, and with full russian support behind him

2018-04-14 19:45:58 UTC  

We cannot continue to support states that can clearly support themselves.

2018-04-14 19:46:19 UTC  

and of course, the moment an accusation is made, Israel does a missile strike

2018-04-14 19:46:35 UTC  

Assad may not have directly called for the use of chemical weapons. but he has them. he could have people in positions of power within the military that are out of control. it's entirely possible.

2018-04-14 19:46:38 UTC  

this couldn't be more obviously people scrambling to have an excuse

2018-04-14 19:46:46 UTC  

It's possible but it's unlikely

2018-04-14 19:46:49 UTC  

all Assad does is deny everything as US propaganda

2018-04-14 19:46:57 UTC  

it's far more likely that it was either faked or done by the rebels rhemselves

2018-04-14 19:46:58 UTC  

and uh

2018-04-14 19:47:01 UTC  

easy job at that

2018-04-14 19:47:10 UTC  

given the sheer amounts of BS US propaganda out there

2018-04-14 19:47:21 UTC  

If the US has to intervene for every humanitarian crisis on the planet, we might as well be the global government.

2018-04-14 19:47:28 UTC  

Assad is not some benevolent leader

2018-04-14 19:47:45 UTC  

He's way better than the alternatives

2018-04-14 19:47:48 UTC  

AKA fucking islamists

2018-04-14 19:48:10 UTC  

but then again this is not a question of benevolence

2018-04-14 19:48:14 UTC  

those fucking islamists 😠

2018-04-14 19:48:31 UTC  

it's not about intervening in every humanitarian crises

2018-04-14 19:48:33 UTC  

this is a question of "why would Assad do something that benefits his opponents with a predictable outcome because it literally happened last year"

2018-04-14 19:48:38 UTC  

perhaps you're not familiar with chemical weapons

2018-04-14 19:48:45 UTC  

It's shameful to prioritize the wars abroad over our own.

2018-04-14 19:49:08 UTC  

The whole issue reeks

2018-04-14 19:49:38 UTC  

it's not that. NATO is supposed to be a defense against Russia. if Russia is defending a regime that is using chemical weapons, it makes perfect sense that there would be some kind of military action

2018-04-14 19:49:49 UTC  

Trump was right to have included France and the UK

2018-04-14 19:49:51 UTC  

"defense"

2018-04-14 19:49:59 UTC  

Include

2018-04-14 19:50:02 UTC  

but w/e.

2018-04-14 19:50:07 UTC  

Why not assist?

2018-04-14 19:50:09 UTC  

or Help?

2018-04-14 19:50:29 UTC  

We are still a leader if we let the NATO states lead themselves from time to time.

2018-04-14 19:50:32 UTC  

Teach a man to fish ffs.

2018-04-14 19:50:32 UTC  

Trump didn't act too badly given this was basically a wristswat in order not to lose face

2018-04-14 19:50:38 UTC  

but the entire claim is BS

2018-04-14 19:50:59 UTC  

It reeks of back-room deals.

2018-04-14 19:51:00 UTC  

it's France and England's fuckery mainly, too

2018-04-14 19:51:04 UTC  

just like Libya was

2018-04-14 19:51:17 UTC  

that is what happened though, it was led by the US and involved UK and France. two very capable air forces

2018-04-14 19:51:35 UTC  

yep.

2018-04-14 19:51:38 UTC  

anyhow, off I go ack

2018-04-14 19:52:17 UTC  

What if it's 4d chess to trick the towelheads in Europe to do terrorism, and finally get citizens to boot them out?

2018-04-14 19:52:55 UTC  

It's interesting how the oil / gas pipelines always come into play when sanctions are thrown.