Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 453333736227078144
He can make better arguments
Their solution is to end property, ours is to regulate markets. --- you just dont get how that's different. Or dont want to
IN many ways, the US already does some of that
It'd have to be more though
End poverty by making everyone worthless; Regulate markets to make innovation worthless / impossible.
*
Markets are people by proxy.
Socially it would mean a support of traditional ideas of social structures....
They hate innovation
Some regulations are good.
Right, thats a communist notion
They just want their feeble slaves
egalitarian marxian socialism, that's communist or "leftist"
“Everything that I don’t like is communist”
Fascism is designed to prevent that
“Everything wrong with collectivism is just communist “
Collective control implies the lack thereof on the individual level. The same applies, even when you hide control of the people through markets.
In hitler's germany, for instance, they wanted a robust free market within the confines of the goals ofthe nation
That's market-grade slavery.
Thanks @Deleted User
Well, its the same tools they use in the US
It failed, however.
I saw the petition, but a lot of people messaged me after I left and it really made me feel better
via tax policy, regulation, special incentives
its all what Hitler did
@Deleted User No. It's way more complex, and imperfect for different reasons.
Hitler actually got his ideas from the USA
“It’s da same”
Same tools
And eventually Fulcrum messaged me with an invite, at that point I really felt a lot better and decided to rejoin
@Deleted User Same tools implies the tools are at fault, and not the action of the person using the tools.
it usurps market freedom so that is the "socialist" aspect of it
but its not the same usage as Marxist
Direct messages are a better way, but I thought, that you seem to like petitions ^^.
I received a lot of mental support from my friends, I've decided that server is more welcoming to me than I thought
Horseshoe theory confirmed
<:gay:382982146249326612>
I actually argue NatSoc should not be used anylonger because popularly no one understands socialism outside of communism or marxian
You're not consistent with your argument. You claim capital markets are the same as facist markets, yet you do not claim that the facist views on control of the markets does not equate to the control of the worth of the people.
I love Marxian