Message from @Hotzendorf

Discord ID: 466488490570547210


2018-07-11 06:15:52 UTC  

I was mentioning how the NOSA images get doctored

2018-07-11 06:15:54 UTC  

fart enough

2018-07-11 06:15:57 UTC  

I mean gair enough

2018-07-11 06:16:02 UTC  

And by 'doctored' I mean 'putting a fake title for the image underneath'

2018-07-11 06:16:02 UTC  

FAIR ENOUGH XD

2018-07-11 06:16:12 UTC  

ahhh

2018-07-11 06:16:16 UTC  

I did eet

2018-07-11 06:16:21 UTC  

<:pepe_hang:460603218766987298>

2018-07-11 06:16:35 UTC  

People were using the same images to claim that these were 'wave graphs' showing all the 'radioactive water' being swept from Japan over the the Western seaboard

2018-07-11 06:16:55 UTC  

ahhh

2018-07-11 06:16:56 UTC  

I remember that

2018-07-11 06:17:30 UTC  

here we go

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372507611284766722/466488186957463552/Energy_plot_japantsunami-e1377791396639.webp

2018-07-11 06:17:35 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372507611284766722/466488207819800586/Energy_plot_japantsunami-e1377791396639.png

2018-07-11 06:17:37 UTC  

Fuck

2018-07-11 06:17:46 UTC  

lel

2018-07-11 06:17:51 UTC  

You know what? No

2018-07-11 06:17:59 UTC  

I ain't deleting it

2018-07-11 06:18:00 UTC  

The second one has slightly higher detail if you look closely enough

2018-07-11 06:18:07 UTC  

...just look

2018-07-11 06:18:27 UTC  

I mean it's also a H I G H Q U A L I T Y P N G

2018-07-11 06:18:43 UTC  

We both got it from Snopes

2018-07-11 06:18:52 UTC  

But I went to Google images

2018-07-11 06:18:54 UTC  

It's a pity there aren't more people to try and argue against the two identical images.

2018-07-11 06:19:00 UTC  

That could've been pretty entertaining.

2018-07-11 06:19:16 UTC  

They probably aren't actually identicle

2018-07-11 06:19:20 UTC  

XD

2018-07-11 06:19:30 UTC  

Mine is a png

2018-07-11 06:19:31 UTC  

Proof

2018-07-11 06:19:33 UTC  

The pixel... over there!

2018-07-11 06:19:53 UTC  

One is 0xFFFFFF and that SAME pixel on the other image is 0xFFFFFE!

2018-07-11 06:20:00 UTC  

It's CLEARLY DIFFERENT! XD

2018-07-11 06:21:16 UTC  

here's something you might enjoy, then

2018-07-11 06:21:50 UTC  

```One of the main points they kept being alarmed about was that Fukushima was dumping 300 US tons of radwater into the PO every day.

After a bit of digging around, it would seem that the Pacific Ocean contains roughly 638,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg of water. After converting that to US tons and rounding down to zero, I got about 703,000,000,000,000,000 tons.```

2018-07-11 06:22:22 UTC  

```Regardless, does this mean that it would take over two quadrillion days for the entire tonnage of the Pacific Ocean to be replaced with water that has passed through the reactor?

In which case, all of the red flags I had at the very beginning seem somewhat justified, and these people are using the "300 tons per day" to sound scary, because 300 tons seems like a lot to Joe Average```

2018-07-11 06:24:25 UTC  

Spooky Nuclear

2018-07-11 06:25:29 UTC  

```If they are cycling water through the waste cooling pools at Fukushima at a total rate of 272 tonnes per day (which comes down to about 3.15 litres per second so that's actually a reasonable figure at least), it would take about 2.38e15 days to cycle the entire volume of the Pacific Ocean at that speed. This is about 6.516e12 years... or 6,516 billion years.

Considering the age of the universe is about 13.7 billion years, the age of Earth about 4.5 billion years, and Earth probably staying habitable for only 500 million years or so (give or take some millions of years) from now, I would say there is no reason to worry about the entire Pacific ocean getting "cycled through" Fukushima plant.```

2018-07-11 06:26:00 UTC  

six thousand billion years 🤣

2018-07-11 06:26:36 UTC  

It's not a bad read on the reddit

2018-07-11 06:26:49 UTC  

There is one thing I remind myself of.