Wether you told me you were drownin

or some that even want to ruin the country for their own personal gain

obama

bush

clinton

mcain

all their friends

Was that partly right?

glow the in dark cia niggers

I don’t remember the song but I like it lol

Phil Collins is a god

oh

this is funny

india doesnt have free speech

once again a country that claims something it doesnt

Restrictions
Under Indian law, the freedom of speech and of the press do not confer an absolute right to express one's thoughts freely.Clause (2) of Article 19 of the Indian constitution enables the legislature to impose certain restrictions on free speech under following he

good ol wikipedia

Security of the State: Reasonable restrictions can be imposed on the freedom of speech and expression, in the interest of the security of the State. All the utterances intended to endanger the security of the State by crimes of violence intended to overthrow the government, waging of war and rebellion against the government, external aggression or war, etc., may be restrained in the interest of the security of the State.[16] It does not refer to the ordinary breaches of public order which do not involve any danger to the State.[

Public order: This ground was added by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951 in order to meet the situation arising from the Supreme Court's decision in Romesh Thapar, s case (AIR 1950 SC 124). The expression 'public order' connotes the sense of public peace, safety and tranquillity.

public order

broad as shit term

could mean anything

wonderful

certainly wont be abused when it doesnt have a clear definition

Decency and morality: The word 'obscenity' is identical with the word 'indecency' of the Indian Constitution. In an English case of R. v. Hicklin,[21] the test was laid down according to which it is seen 'whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscene tend to deprave and corrupt the minds which are open to such immoral influences'. This test was upheld by the Supreme Court in Ranjit D. Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1965 SC 881). In this case the Court upheld the conviction of a book seller who was prosecuted under Section 292, I.P.C., for selling and keeping the book Lady Chatterley's Lover. The standard of morality varies from time to time and from place to place.

what ever society declares is decent

anything other than that

its actually not free speech

Well don’t all countries give the guise that something exist that truly isn’t there? Borders, free speech, the will of freedom to do whatever you want?

all of them do that

the only country with real free speach is the USA

im tired of meeting so many retards thinking their countries are so great

sure be patriotic but dont be retarded

notice an issue

so you can fix it

octopus and olives on rye

a bantz sandwich

hmm

where did that south asian go

rip

Humans don’t have free will we have choices