and dutch

they both commited the same atrocities

I would say the spanish might have done more

The Hudson Bay co and the NW co were state run monopolies. If you lived in Canada, you worked for "the Company" and bought your goods from "the company"

Well no different that East India Company lol

spanish empire didnt live long enough to do more

True, but small differences

spanish empire destroyed 2 cuvilizations

yeah and the british didnt?

and decimated a third

native americans middle easterns south asians

All of them are still aroubd

India was better off British

The difference between British and Spanish colonisation is that there are still native American tribes in America. You don't see too many South Americans still throwing glass spears at one another and eating hearts for blood gods.

and america did worse to the natives than the brits

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki They were on our land, bucko

you know

Oh no im not condemning the americans

unlike the british

Im just not blaming the brits for what americans did

i think its a good thing that the aztecs were exterminated

lets be honest

what abiut the mayans and incas?

I wouldn't disagree

they terrorized south america

sacrificing thousands a day

The aztecs were monsters.

The 'noble savage' is a myth. The natives were better off American or Canadian

Point being the Spanish gave far fewer fucks than the brits about natives.

or the french for that matter

most of those civilizations were wiped out by disease

and the french used them as shields

Well they're the French.

cant really credit the spanish for enslaving a few thousand

when a million more were killed by the pox

the british understood this and used that against the native north americans

giving them infected blankets and such

that was americans not brits

we were free before that

Disregarding disease though. The Spanish were far more murdery than we were.

That's actually an urban myth