@DecadeUK Who did you want sargon to debate anyways?

i had to try and put the engineering spin on it otherwise i would have just ended up killing myself in the sea of mediocrity

i didn't have the names, that's what i came here for @AsianMessiah

I couldn't do it. Glhf

of who? SJWs? @DecadeUK

my original question was to try and seek the SJW equivalent of sargon, someone who offers a counter arguement without screeching about it

when i was told they dont exist, i rephrased the question to the debate issue

david Pakman?

i'm on a fact finding mission, so to speak

You wont find them?

@DecadeUK Ancaps are far more un-screechy im sure youll find

Are there any sjw versions of sargons who don’t skreech?

Not to my knowledge

I cant remember Anyone at the top of my mind

i was having a hard time understanding that, based on the sheer numbers of people involved

ideally i'd love to see a direct video response to some of sargons work from their side, the way that he picks apart their videos piece by piece

the only unscreechy femnist i can think of is franny

i'm just looking for more insight into their justifications

i have a hard time understanding how people cant believe in global warming.

Its not that, they just dont think that slowing down economic progress is a good solution

Because it doesn't work like they think it does

Plus nuclear and fracking is good

(comparitively)

Nuclear is good

And it dosent contribute to global warming

^^^

"winters are colder than ever"

”Its cold where I am!”

still though

the ancaps vs classical liberals

is a good idea

👌

because were not enemies

but we disagree enough

commies are the enemies

to have a substantial debate

get the NOOSE

Meh. i don’t know enough about economy to be good for an argument.

Might join just to listen later.

we both want personal liberty, we just disagree on pragmatics

that's a beautiful way of putting it