Message from @halfthink
Discord ID: 477342864263610369
N
O
U
๐๐ธ ๐ค
NAY THEE
Stop being retards
โโ แตค
no, ur mom
Nae thou
Y'alls being vaginas
Liberalism is left wing but capitalism is right wing. Fascism is right wing but socialism is left wing. All true statements can be proved by the axioms. If a true statement cannot be proved by the axioms, then it is added to the axioms. This statement cannot be proved by the axioms.
That's retarded
Only Sith deal in absolutes
The Sith did nothing wrong.
Yeah they did
Well, not in their eyes
I love democracy
They're a race that exists in a constant state of war
I love refugees
>Liberalism is left wing but capitalism is right wing
<:thronk:441701565607444482>
Capitalism and liberalism should be on the same side and socialism and fascism should be on the other. The only way of defining left and right that would put commies and Nazis on opposite sides is to say right vs left is nature vs nurture.
Saying nothing is a social construct is just as retarded as saying everything is. Defining left and right this way makes centrism the only valid position, so this is a retarded way of defining left and right.
Either the alt right are leftists or socialism is right wing.
They would probably both have to go on the same side as monarchists and I don't think it makes sense to put them on the left. Therefore, socialism is right wing and capitalism is left wing. Socialism started out as right wing anyway. It was conceived in an attempt to terminate the French revolution and reestablish the monarchy.
The Left/Right dichotomy is derived from a top down view, looking at how society is organized in regards to group identity, roughly incorporating economic freedom as well
Proletariat vs Bourgeouise, German vs Jews, Minority vs 'oppressor', pick your flavor
Or progressive stacks
Bourgeoisie and Jews were minorities
So?
Proletariat and Germans were the majority
Anyways, the further right you go, the more responsibility is delegated downwards onto the individual
So monarchists are leftists in your opinion?
It depends how much responsibility is delegated downwards. In comparison to what?
Whose monarchy?
The type that doesn't have a democracy under the hood.
It's such an abstract term, that you need to be more specific. Is it just any system that has a hereditary head of state?
Disband the monarchy
What about anarcho-monarchy?
(Yeah, it's a thing)