Message from @Spagelo
Discord ID: 480085730027372554
They aren't allowed to hit you, so idk
School houses are a naturally emergent phenomenon in communities anyways
So I hear that this is where the Sceptic community is at
yeah, common mistake
Ah
Well, I guess if there is one positive about Sceptism, it produces humor
Sargons not here
Fucking Athens.
I refuse to go to Athens until they fix their channel names
Not terfs so much. Or was it turfs? Hell, I can't remember.
I personally think that Sceptism is asinine, but I wanted to debate it with believers
So I'll pose my inquiry:
@King Canuck *-Donald Trump will remember that-*
🤔
You're skeptical of skepticism?
Even if what you immediately perceive is unreliable, could you really convince yourself that it is night when the ruling faculty of your mind differs to tell you that it is day? You would think, even if you could not determine exactly how many individual specks of dust are on your desk, that you could gather enough epistemological evidence that would suffice to say that there is dust on your desk.
I mean... I dunno
But it is
We going down a deconstructionist rabbit hole?
@Spagelo We're living inside of a 4D projection of an 8D quasi Crystal, with triangular planck scale sized "pixles" making up reality.
Get used to it.
I was doing something else and skimmed
Just made some burgers.
I personally laughed through the fragments of Timon and Silloi
It just doesn't make sense
So you fancy yourself an intellectual. Nothing wrong with that.
Epictetus said it better:
```If a man should come forward and say: "Know that there is nothing that can be known, but all things are incapable of sure evidence;" or if another says, "Believe me and you will be the better for it, that a man ought not to believe any thing;" or again, if another should say, "Learn from me, man, that it is not possible to learn any thing; I tell you this and will teach you, if you please." Now in what respect do these differ from those? Whom shall I name? Those who call themselves Academics? "Men, agree with us that no man agrees with another: believe us that no man believes anybody."```
This sounds like mental masturbation
What's your take on things?
mutual mental masturbation?
Just... lemme get my brain lubed up first. heheheh
Also, that quote seems a bit nonsensical if you take the full context of it. *shrug*
If we can't trust anything or know anything how can you use what you can't know to not prove that? XD
Here's the rest:
It's about pragmatism.
If it works... well, it can't be that bad.