Message from @Shurik
Discord ID: 493678493230432257
Haven't heard of Snow crash, but if it pulls off that idea well, I should check it out. Thanks!
Usually.
They are long thou
I'm always interested by works with a certain intent that end up backfiring, like how the Soviets screened The Grapes of Wrath to besmirch the US but ended up achieving the opposite effect since everyone there was amazed we even had cars here.
I've read 3, Snow Crash, The Cryptonomicon, and The SevenEves.
I still think snow crash is his best book of the 3
I'll check it out. A lot of his books are deep and with a shitton of research.
Thou I love his deconstruction of feminist thought in Cryptonomicon. Written in the late 90's
Before feminism became as toxic as fememism.
It's one of my favorite passages from all his books
It's not a memorable book, it's good but it'll never be a classic
I think it's too early to make that call. I think it stands the test of time but not Asimov or Heinlein.
Sorry to interrupt, but back on the topic of authorial intent, my conscience gets a bit troubled when I see an amazing film like, say *Come and See,* which is a Russian film about a young boy who tries to ride out WW2 and ends up fighting for the Motherland to protect his countrymen from the Nazis. The execution of that film is apolitical, but is it moral to like a film that may be indirectly promoting communism?
I don't even consider it cypunk.
I think snow crash is cypunk and is actually going to be a classic. Cryptonomicon not so much.
I think it's best classification is historical fiction. Cryptonomicon.
I would also add in SevenEves but that's because it's his most recent work.
Just because a film or piece of literature is made in a time period and promotes certian ideas doesn't make it any better or worse. One of my favorite things about Soviet films is how they still speak to the human condition dispute them being propoganda
The premise of 7eves is the boom blows up and the atmosphere is going to be in fire. How is humanity going to survive.
It's not bad. The problem of the book is it's first half is like The Martian on steroids, and the second half is unfinished.
I'm glad to hear someone else feels the same way; this is the movie I referred to, by the way. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDq9fL--Avw
I'm reading Dostoyevsky slowly but surely in Russian.
It's super rough
Which one?
Crime and Punnishment is first up
Next is the Brothers, after that it'll probably be either notes from. Underground or the idiot
I think that's an exaggeration, but I'll see.
It may be bad Dostoyevsky. But it's still Dostoyevsky.
I've heard that most consider The Idiot his weakest, but that it's still very good. Although I haven't heard anything about Notes.
I'm only familair with C & P and Brothers, myself, and it's been too long.
It's also classic Russian literature.
That shit is always at minimum 500 pages
I'm much more familiar with Russian film than literature, myself, but I'd like to start. Have you read any Chekov?
Bits and pieces.
I've read cherry tree? Or is it cherry orchard
Good play.
I read a bit of Uncle Vanya, but life sidetracked me.
I've recently discovered Peter Hamilton.
And by God does he know how to write.
If you have the time to read check out Pandora's Star.