I cant

Chemicals in the water are turnning the gays frog.

Since frogs aren't people I'm double confirmed

taxonomically speaking a sepices is defined by fertile offspring

BRB wanking bowsette

@flyingfoxel nobody cares

@Niggler let them try to deletus linux

holy fuck this place is more cancer than it usually is

Forks exist

I stopped lurking

thus cancer

species may interbreed to form sub species but they do no form whole new ones. unless isolated to the extent they can no longer breed

Maybe it wouldn't be with this God forsaken (((ranks))) system

idk man if the shit you posted wasn't filtered out by the spam filters you might actually gain rank

Remember Goyim. God collects the foreskins of babies.

I'm rank 6 and growing stronger

You're rank allright.

this is how it is used in journals your definition is the laymans understanding. none refers to mule as a species it;s a hybrid

@Niggler do you need the CMC

(((greyfags)))

Lewd

@jigantie plz halp

Ayy lmao @jigantie

@flyingfoxel nobody still cares

That's an ugly man

I'm sure Sargon would love him

@Niggler dont @ me greyfag

Check your privilege ass hole

@flyingfoxel I just described to you how even journals can't agree upon a definition.

The most broad sense is "A genetically distinct, and geographically removed population"

@Fitzydog oh my God who the hell cares

Only fascists pay attention to biology

Ask Vox

@Moooooooooooooo Fuck off, no one invited you here

^

Actually I'm pretty sure the subreddit did

\*rescinded*

@Fitzydog in the majority of journals to day that defining line IS the abilty to have fertile offspring.

I'm here to stay faggots

*dabs*

2 nerds are having a interesting discussion and you're being a cunt. That's a fast way to get banned tbh

I get banned for gay shit? Not surprised