THEY WON'T GIVE YOU THAT RIGHT!

You're assuming my stances.

No, you STATED your stances.

You just have no idea the conclusion of such a state.

I would like to be a boyfriend owner <:pepe_sad:378719408345841664> @Deleted User

And you're projecting your thoughts as my arguments.

No, I'm telling you that your bullshit won't work and how it won't work.

<:pepehands:378719408367075333>

Anyway, my bullshit is being rational.

Your bullshit seems to be putting words in my mouth.

I'll stay in my lane and think for myself and I advise you do the same

Well Nero, you don't have that right.

So shut up or WE *the state* will kill you.

I'm afraid, I do.

I JUST SAID YOU DON'T HAVE THAT RIGHT YOU IDIOT

*bang*

Oof

Still here.

That's where you get with just the Second Amendment and no First Amendment.

You're just being moronic.

It's an internet argument, dude. Give up

@Nero Your argument doesn't hold any water

You understand we've had this fight in real life, right?

There's a reason I'm right.

you're a fucking colander

What's a colander?

You.

Lol

Full of holes after the state suppresses you for speaking when you didn't have permission.

Okay, shut up about me now.

Move on.

Nope. I have that right.

As long as you talk shit I'll feel free to answer it.

GENTLEMEN!!

It seems everyone is being tarded here, and I'm seeing inaccuracies everywhere

Look out we have a radical centrist here.

Yeah man, seems like these people take internet arguments too personally.

"SOMEONE DISAGREED WITH ME ON THE INTENRET, OPEN THE FLOODGATES!!"

How did I personally attack anyone here?

Someone said something about pulling a gun in public should be defended by the 2nd amendment.

Even the founders did not agree to this.
It was common to have local ordinances where even touching your sidearm was considered "assault", in the same way verbal threats are "assault"

Any time

Are we still talking about that argument or this is something different?