Message from @Got it memorized?

Discord ID: 568221183145672725


2019-04-17 23:37:40 UTC  

Point is we don’t need more

2019-04-17 23:38:34 UTC  

STYX is still making albums.... released one in 2017.

2019-04-17 23:40:53 UTC  

We do need more journos. A lot of them. Because we dont have enough good and objective ones.

2019-04-17 23:41:30 UTC  

@Got it memorized? Yes, the trade skills are hurting for labor

2019-04-17 23:42:41 UTC  

@MountainMan Everyone's a journalist now. It's a dime a dozen job. The people that have a drive and desire to do a good job can easily create an audience these days.

See? The problem already solved itself through the market

2019-04-17 23:43:04 UTC  

sup gamers

2019-04-17 23:43:34 UTC  

Yes. The good journos are the ones who will be best fit.

2019-04-17 23:43:40 UTC  

breaking out the hard r are we

2019-04-17 23:43:48 UTC  

sorry gama

2019-04-17 23:43:51 UTC  

ty

2019-04-17 23:43:52 UTC  

Problem is that we do not have enough. We need more people like Martin Schiebe and the likes.

2019-04-17 23:44:02 UTC  

evening gama

2019-04-17 23:44:09 UTC  

gamer is our word, but you can say gama. @Den Röda Smurfen

2019-04-17 23:44:14 UTC  

yes

2019-04-17 23:46:26 UTC  

@MountainMan The problem is people like yourself saying this, and demanding that a market intervention happen in order to fulfill the need.

Just let it ride. It will sort itself out naturally.

2019-04-17 23:46:51 UTC  

Oh I dont believe in an intervention, that will jsut damage things.

2019-04-17 23:47:20 UTC  

I just did a statement. That we *need* more good journalist. Not necessarily that we should overflow the market with them with incentives that wont hold.

2019-04-17 23:47:26 UTC  

Don't give people free college to become journalists, don't incentivize it, don't touch it.

The people that should be there will find themselves there.

2019-04-17 23:47:49 UTC  

Yes, we are agreeing. I didnt advocate for an intervention.

2019-04-17 23:48:00 UTC  

*DON'T EVEN LOOK AT IT!!*

2019-04-17 23:48:07 UTC  

next you'll tell me you want a meritocracy

2019-04-17 23:48:22 UTC  

Capitalism is a meritocracy

2019-04-17 23:48:26 UTC  

Intervening in the business will just damage it in the long run.

2019-04-17 23:48:42 UTC  

@MountainMan It's Schrodinger's market right now. Just observing it will ruin the effect lol

2019-04-17 23:48:56 UTC  

kek hahahahahahah

2019-04-17 23:49:51 UTC  

But I do like the idea of subsidizing some type of businesses. Like the medical one, and the Universities who create the workers. What is your view of that?

2019-04-17 23:50:20 UTC  

None

2019-04-17 23:50:38 UTC  

Oh you dont have a view on that? Okay.

2019-04-17 23:50:53 UTC  

Regulation, tax, and subsidies are like a three sided coin

2019-04-17 23:50:56 UTC  

Subsidies are just corporate welfare

2019-04-17 23:51:15 UTC  

Yes. Shouldnt we subsidize helpful things?

2019-04-17 23:51:18 UTC  

Any business that cannot succeed independently deserves to collapse

2019-04-17 23:51:20 UTC  
2019-04-17 23:51:38 UTC  

It's a market crutch

2019-04-17 23:52:12 UTC  

I'm just thinking of that one idea where lowering a tax upon one thing makes it consumed more. Shouldnt it be a good idea to lower the tax on stuff like eco food?

2019-04-17 23:52:14 UTC  

It makes things worse and less efficient, because the market becomes dependent on the subsidies

2019-04-17 23:52:20 UTC  

Ahhhhh true.

2019-04-17 23:52:33 UTC  

Regulation does the opposite

2019-04-17 23:53:03 UTC  

It create barriers to entry that the established companies don't have to worry about

2019-04-17 23:53:20 UTC  

guys

2019-04-17 23:53:21 UTC  

@Fitzydog how do you feel about current subsidies for public education?