Message from @Legiondude
Discord ID: 573017860507566080
I'm a sucker for the Ram tank and the Kangaroo derivative, the little subturret it has really pleases me for some reason.
@M4Gunner Hunnicutt cites that it had 250 gallons of fuel stored between two tanks in the lower hull and two in the turret
ive never been a fan o brits, but the Churchill Crocodile was the shiz
Looks like the two turret tanks were situated on either side of the commander's seat
Churchill Crocodile had the best k/d ratio
Mmmmm
Light tank flamethrowers are nice
@TwinVickers tf is that
spaag based on a sherman.
Well the tanks he was right beside were connected to a periscope oriented flamethrower
looks like hvss too
looks like someone farted in a sherry
Think remote control MG like on modern abrams, but with fire
storming Japan
oh it was vvss
Open top you say?
Weren't they considering a variant of the Sherman with either 6 or 8 .50 cals at one point?
Patton wanted all the guns
No
I will never understand the MGMC series of vehicles
But he did recommend new Shermans should be loaded with tons of machine guns
Patton is over rated
Or, CGMC, rather
Yeah, but they have different ballistics
Yeah, my bad lol
germans should of made Stug3afg's and they might of won
MGMC is a great series
CGMC is wildly optimistic
Monty was righ, in theory
@M4Gunner the M2 and M3 would completely agree with you, down to the fixed machineguns in the hull.
Why they didn't at least put them in ball mounts is beyond me
for AA, even in WW2, autocannons were really a requirement
yanks and russians won in quantity, germans had the quality
I mean, they already have like 7 crew in the M3 so it's not that big a deal
German quality was oversold and they had built in alot of inefficiencies due to Nazi ideology blinding them