Saudis are weak ass scrawny bois

jesus christ these leftists

<:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>

got kicked from a server that's supposedly neutral just for pointing out that right wing has no coherent definition anymore and getting insulted by fucking everyone

this is why I don't try and debate these morons anymore

<:kek:590371888480387073>

@Harazu Keshtah Here's a good definition: The right believes in natural heirarchy

The Right doesn't know what it is. Fitzy thinks he's more Social Conservative than me

<:kek:590371888480387073>

I told you what it is.

The British have no idea what Right Wing means, and they have no concept of a society worth conserving.

I don't even call myself 'conservative', because that implies that society should be 'maintained' in its current form

Everyone is born inherently conservative, and either left wing or right wing in mentality.

Progressivism is a modern mind virus.

the guy in the group mentioned that with some other things but I'll contest that defintion because that definition by it's very nature creates a very clear dichotomy of communist vs noncommunist.

Which?

" Here's a good definition: The right believes in natural heirarchy " this definition

How though?

Here's others: empathy for the weak, versus sympathy for the strong

aside from communism name any other ideology that also holds no natural dichotomy as a tennant.

Utilitarianism, from which communism sprung

some sects of political religion too. personaly I just see the whole right left dichotomy as pointless thought terminating rehtoric

In a ways, it is.

It's only true so far as to classify people into two groups of the empathetic vs the orderly types

we should probably move this to politics but I must ask why are those two dichotomous?

Once you separate progressivism from 'left wing', it's a pointless classifier

Old people and niggers steal my pension

@Harazu Keshtah I should say 'mercy VS justice'

It's not good to have one and not the other

That's your left VS right in reality

you're kinda illustrating my point. because I can think of many ways to twist both those terms into mixing with eachother.

They always will

And I'm agreeing with you lol

I'm just giving some nuance to the point

the only dichotomy that truly matters in the end for the world of politics is collectiveism vs individualism.

Eh

Not really

We are a Heirarchical species that self organizes into collectives on several different axises

It's a very 2D low IQ dichotomy to make

groups aren't collectives humans organize into groups but that doesn't reflect how they perceive themselves

Yes, all humans see themselves by their group identity.

Why do you think identity politics is so easy to spread?

Im making a radio detonated explosive charge ama

I must not be human than because I sure don't

People instinctually see themselves as a part of a group, and their rank within that hierarchy

Im making a radio detonated explosive charge ama