For the believer, no proof is necessary. For the unbeliever, no proof will ever be enough.

she's clipping

What a larping statement

Give her a thumbs down

“Can’t convince people”

It has to be better for the kid or something by some measure that has been measured

All I could find is that men who stay home spend less time on child care than women who stay home

No it's a quote from the socialist Stuart Chase

Not saying you’re Larpy unless you believe it

More or less me being fascetious

The real research comes from the efficiency seen when that was the social norm and when that was seen as appropriate.

In reality, the main issue ought to be the fact that a family that stays together has better progeny, really.

Taking it from the resultant ought to be the real argument.

Yeah it’s too many people disagree with that though

Idt*

With maintaining the nuclear household?

Yeah I think most people would say that is better for children

All of the research is there for that

I mean that's a big factor that always pops up with regard to black criminality; the lack of a father figure.

Yup which lefties always blame on whitey lmao

The person I was talking to used single parent homes of moms and dads and the fact that the kids come out the same as an argument for moms not being better parents

Imagine thinking you can extrapolate single parent children to a normal family

But stemming from this retention of both parents, comes into what is most harmonious to that retention, and I think one could accurately come to the conclusion that a stay at home mother is better for this; just use statistics of divorce and conflate them with the rise of "female liberation". The rise of the latter sees a corresponding rise in the former.

Yeah the argument isn’t even whether or not someone saying home is better

It’s why the female should be the one staying at home over the male

And the only fact based argument I found was that women who stay home spend more time on children than men who stay ho e

Home*

Tbh I feel like that is solid enough evidence

That's certainly accurate. But taking it logically, I'd put the ball in their court;

To say what? That this is a societal pressure or something

Can a woman who gets paid less than men according to their wage gap theory, properly provide for the family?

Then what do they say?

“That’s sexism and needs to change”

And if that means spiting the children to do that?

Very true

Good argument

Just use their bullshit against them.

It all falls a part

Of course, this is saying they don't start screaming at you before that happens.

Yup exactly

There really is no argument for it in their world unless they are going to put the children at risk in order to push for a gender wage gap that may or may not exist