Message from @Fitzydog

Discord ID: 621201280731316225


2019-09-11 04:26:48 UTC  

The social media host is not a social media site. It's the same data to be used on many websites as you like, to be presented as you like, and you can revoke access whenever you like

2019-09-11 04:27:27 UTC  

Mornin lads

2019-09-11 04:27:28 UTC  

i dont think that would work at all though, im willing to pay, im not willing to seed

2019-09-11 04:27:42 UTC  

Well you wouldn't seed then lol

2019-09-11 04:27:47 UTC  

Some people would

2019-09-11 04:27:57 UTC  

Some people would make their own social media host

2019-09-11 04:27:58 UTC  

its convoluted

2019-09-11 04:28:13 UTC  

It's seemless to most users

2019-09-11 04:29:57 UTC  

if the creator is in any way depending on seeders it's pointless. a seed is a drop in the ocean

2019-09-11 04:30:14 UTC  

youd have 1000 views for every seed

2019-09-11 04:30:16 UTC  

The creator relies on paying for hosting at first

2019-09-11 04:30:18 UTC  

if that

2019-09-11 04:30:34 UTC  

the creator can and should simply continue to pay for hosting

2019-09-11 04:31:01 UTC  

Sure. But the seeding is also an option

2019-09-11 04:31:13 UTC  

its not worth implementing

2019-09-11 04:31:28 UTC  

🤷

2019-09-11 04:31:38 UTC  

I feel like it would be at some point

2019-09-11 04:31:41 UTC  

it doesnt solve the problem

2019-09-11 04:31:52 UTC  

The problem is centralized servers

2019-09-11 04:32:00 UTC  

no it isnt

2019-09-11 04:32:06 UTC  

To me it is

2019-09-11 04:32:16 UTC  

the problem is offering a free service to users and creators at the same time

2019-09-11 04:32:26 UTC  

Well that's your problem lol

2019-09-11 04:32:37 UTC  

its not my problem, it's the platform's

2019-09-11 04:33:06 UTC  

Yeah, I guess sure. It's just not the problem I was solving lol

2019-09-11 04:33:12 UTC  

So quit your yammering and keep watching jewtube

2019-09-11 04:33:23 UTC  

<:sargoy:382978736053551104>

2019-09-11 04:33:42 UTC  

the problem you should be solving is youtube's lack of profitability
thats the only reason they maintain their monopoly

2019-09-11 04:33:49 UTC  

there is no other problem

2019-09-11 04:34:26 UTC  

Did you forget about the card companies forcing them to behave the way they do?

2019-09-11 04:34:57 UTC  

Or the hosting companies banning bitchute?

2019-09-11 04:34:57 UTC  

just use a Russian payment processor, camrode

2019-09-11 04:35:56 UTC  

those are wholly seperate monopolies which need competition so that their business tactics fail

2019-09-11 04:36:57 UTC  

but those companies are already profitable -- it is no issue for a based host or processor to take all their customers

2019-09-11 04:37:19 UTC  

What?

2019-09-11 04:37:55 UTC  

literally just that

2019-09-11 04:38:43 UTC  

anyone can set up a server farm and make money

2019-09-11 04:38:49 UTC  

There are no 'based processors'.

There's just Visa/Mastercard

2019-09-11 04:39:16 UTC  

SubscribeStar has based Russian payment processor, camrode

2019-09-11 04:39:50 UTC  

Let's see how long that lasts before it's yeeted by the FTC or something

2019-09-11 04:40:04 UTC  

Or Visa/Mastercard just prevents people from using them