Message from @An Craoibhín Aoibhinn
Discord ID: 340258121693790219
Mate
Rhodesia was the breadbasket of Africa
What lead to their downfall was the UN
And the Communists
^
There were a lot of Africans fighting for Rhodesia though
Insisting on not using the swastika that you might win the normies favor is the most LARP you could ever do
And their own fucking people in Britain
"N-No u"
Rhodesia convinced niggers to fight for white rule, 7/8 of the army and policy were white
Rhodesia still was too tolerate of niggers
You don't fucking placate you dumbass
Stop being an arsehole and consider the argument
nah man
His and my argument is that the symbol is irrelevant
It's the policy that matters
^
If you don't want to use it then don't but don't rationalize it with such a faggot argument
Could insisting on trading metabolisms be seen as insensitive?
IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE IT FOR THE EXACT SAME RESULT
AND GET RESULTS EASIER WITHOUT IT
WHY USE IT
The swastika is an old symbol
Where does the cucking stop?
Oh well let's stop being racist so we get more people Xddd
There is no cucking it's simply using your goddamned brain on how to actually win instead of going "Hurp we should just go gas congress right now"
"amirite guys"
You're bordering on breaking the fifth rule
until eventually you're no better than the John birch society
Monarchist you sound like you just got done reading GLR fam
kek
You sound like you never have
Someone hasn't read this
No I have which is why I know he's made that exact argument
I haven't read it either but point 1 is exactly what I'm trying to push constantly
Someone hasnt read this http://ropeculture.org/2017/01/13/zero-tolerance/
Why else would totalitarians like us side with libertarians like ancaps but to win so one of our groups can win, and at least be a less painful loss for the one that eventually loses
Why won't it reeeeeaaaddddd?
I don't see authoritarian as the same as totalitarian
it's close enough to be near interchangable