Now, not like some one didnt already have this but now its public LMAO

@Blade I don't think its for those types of calculations at all

Yes it is @ikillu

"The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large computational space. Here, we report using a processor with programmable superconducting qubits to create quantum states on 53 qubits, occupying a state space 2^53 ~ 10^16. Measurements fro…"

Source https://agenparl.eu/quantum-supremacy-using-a-programmable-superconducting-processor/

Click on the BING Cache and read the document

bingj dot con, heh, I ain't clickin that bro

Idgaf what you do

P vs NP problems are no longer a thing

I assume this paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.00444.pdf is the runner up to this new paper that got pulled

@ikillu https://archive.is/8Oeqz See this is the original news post about it

GET YOUR Post-Quantum Cryptography READY BOI LMAO

https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/Post-Quantum-Cryptography/Round-2-Submissions

https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/nistir/8240/final

Seriously this is big news

https://twitter.com/grittygrease/status/1086339192416743424

A COMPUTATIONAL TASK TO
DEMONSTRATE QUANTUM SUPREMACY
To demonstrate quantum supremacy, we compare our quantum processor against state-of-the-art classical computers in the task of sampling the output of a pseudo- random quantum circuit[24{26]. Random circuits are a suitable choice for benchmarking since they do not possess structure and therefore allow for limited guarantees of computational hardness[24, 25, 27, 28]. We design the circuits to entangle a set of quantum bits (qubits) by repeated application of single-qubit and two-qubit logical operations. Sampling the quantum circuit’s output produces a set of bitstrings, e.g. f0000101, 1011100, ...g. Due to quantum interference, the probability distribution of the bitstrings resembles a speckled intensity pattern produced by light interference in laser scatter, such that some bitstrings are much more likely to occur than others.

If this design is shifted a little to guess the factors of a private key of a asymmetric cryptographic algorithm based on some N number of samples of encrypted messages, then this shit is literally magic.

traditional encryption is basically obsolete now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb_f9KpYipk

This some real shit finally

Along with the rest of the channel

weird

you were serious about it applying to encryption @Blade ?

Yes I am

This shit is serious, I am serious

This should all be front page news but you know how that goes

This paper that was pulled may have been pulled due to it not being peer reviewed or it could be to it being groundbreaking tech and it as an accident that it was posted at all so they pulled it, what ever the case is the fact remains that there was a paper posted that show evidence for such a system to do what I described up above

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDANvtOkEc4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA5thMaxkyY

AMAZING!

it makes me wonder why no one is talking about it all too much though

Because politics is waaaaaaayyyy more interesting (pro-tip hint: its not)

And funny enough I understand some of what these videos are saying because its part of my job to know about radio frequencies and electronics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MfABBLtBd0

it's not mentioned anywhere on /g/ or /biz/

Im not surprised

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwjlEdwi2LU

This is where I got lost for sure

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVXJgn3fDkg

And so on