Message from @Blade

Discord ID: 625338043213152280


2019-09-21 16:44:57 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/597164601515180032/625009587174637610/Screenshot_2019-09-21-17-44-35.png

2019-09-21 18:02:07 UTC  
2019-09-21 18:02:37 UTC  

Don't be evil

2019-09-21 20:31:55 UTC  

@Captain Kirk JT just create 20 more and add them <:feelslmaoman:376622501180080128>

2019-09-22 12:14:37 UTC  

cool book

2019-09-22 14:13:45 UTC  

Google what?

2019-09-22 14:13:50 UTC  

BITCH

2019-09-22 14:14:05 UTC  

"A paper by Google’s researchers seen by the FT, that was briefly posted earlier this week on a Nasa website before being removed, claimed that their processor was able to perform a calculation in three minutes and 20 seconds that would take today’s most advanced classical computer, known as Summit, approximately 10,000 years."

2019-09-22 14:14:12 UTC  

No good amigo

2019-09-22 14:14:50 UTC  

Mathematical foundations of crypto broke, come back later

2019-09-22 14:15:02 UTC  
2019-09-22 14:16:41 UTC  

Now, not like some one didnt already have this but now its public LMAO

2019-09-22 14:28:19 UTC  

@Blade I don't think its for those types of calculations at all

2019-09-22 14:30:01 UTC  

Yes it is @ikillu

2019-09-22 14:30:03 UTC  

"The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large computational space. Here, we report using a processor with programmable superconducting qubits to create quantum states on 53 qubits, occupying a state space 2^53 ~ 10^16. Measurements fro…"

2019-09-22 14:30:39 UTC  

Click on the BING Cache and read the document

2019-09-22 14:32:50 UTC  

bingj dot con, heh, I ain't clickin that bro

2019-09-22 14:33:22 UTC  

Idgaf what you do

2019-09-22 14:33:30 UTC  

P vs NP problems are no longer a thing

2019-09-22 14:34:21 UTC  

I assume this paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.00444.pdf is the runner up to this new paper that got pulled

2019-09-22 14:35:04 UTC  

@ikillu https://archive.is/8Oeqz See this is the original news post about it

2019-09-22 14:36:33 UTC  

GET YOUR Post-Quantum Cryptography READY BOI LMAO

2019-09-22 14:40:12 UTC  

Seriously this is big news

2019-09-22 15:22:08 UTC  

A COMPUTATIONAL TASK TO
DEMONSTRATE QUANTUM SUPREMACY
To demonstrate quantum supremacy, we compare our quantum processor against state-of-the-art classical computers in the task of sampling the output of a pseudo- random quantum circuit[24{26]. Random circuits are a suitable choice for benchmarking since they do not possess structure and therefore allow for limited guarantees of computational hardness[24, 25, 27, 28]. We design the circuits to entangle a set of quantum bits (qubits) by repeated application of single-qubit and two-qubit logical operations. Sampling the quantum circuit’s output produces a set of bitstrings, e.g. f0000101, 1011100, ...g. Due to quantum interference, the probability distribution of the bitstrings resembles a speckled intensity pattern produced by light interference in laser scatter, such that some bitstrings are much more likely to occur than others.

2019-09-22 15:28:56 UTC  

If this design is shifted a little to guess the factors of a private key of a asymmetric cryptographic algorithm based on some N number of samples of encrypted messages, then this shit is literally magic.

2019-09-22 15:31:30 UTC  

traditional encryption is basically obsolete now

2019-09-22 15:59:03 UTC  

This some real shit finally

2019-09-22 15:59:14 UTC  

Along with the rest of the channel

2019-09-22 16:01:06 UTC  

weird

2019-09-22 16:01:21 UTC  

you were serious about it applying to encryption @Blade ?

2019-09-22 16:03:25 UTC  

Yes I am