Message from @Litinit
Discord ID: 581114733076283403
had to walk almost 15mins to this kfc which I'm not doing again but aside from that it's the train
i just eat steaks and eggs
all day erry day
ground beef if the market is rough
i think your criticism of the jews is misguided
its a lot like how black people criticize white people
instead of hating them, learn from them and become like them
I'm not criticizing jews
quote me
I'm saying by the statistics (their own polling/survey opinion results) they only support affirmative action if it disproportionally affects white people where as the black demographic didn't care either way
I'm not saying it's wrong to hate white people or that they're bad people for thinking this way, although that's my personal opinion but that's really not my point
>learn from them and become like them
not sure I want to be the kind of person that feels like I should own a news station and push the agenda that it's not ok to be white (or whatever else)
I'm trying to call into the JLP show but it says the number is not recognised ???
what are you calling and from where?
I think i got it now actually
from the UK
gotta put a few numbers in front of it
gonna check how much its gonna cost first
001 or +1
Election results when?
Euro elections in the UK are today
also it will cost me a decent amount to call Jesse
I know the euro elections are today, but when are the results in?
Sunday
Wonderful. I'm excited
I can get rid of prints on a gun with wipes right, do I need a particular kind of wipe or?
like does it help if it's alcohol hand sanitizer wipes
Prints aren't that bad. It's more the DNA/ballistic evidence. Moreover, there us gunpowder residue on your hands that can be seen. The ballistics, if it was a rifled round, can be traced to specific guns. You will have left DNA everywhere. As far as prints, just get something that'll smudge them. Also, don't forget the shell casing, if it was you that loaded the magazine. @Litinit
Traced to a specific gun. Like a snowflake
prints are bad if you find them on the trigger piece of a smoking gun
multiple dna on a gun, but only one set of prints on the trigger, surely that's at very least _not good_
It'd be a partial print, not enough for anything conclusive, if it was just the trigger.
well obviously you'd have the whole hand grip
Multiple DNA on a gun, but one persons DNA on a crime scene
but surely you could match the trigger one to the rest, or at very least conclude that it wasn't one person holding it and another pressing the trigger
There isn't enough width on a trigger to get enough of a print to match to anything.
that's not true
but don't get hung up on that