depends ont he examiner themselves actually

no,m you just cant admit there is something u don't know

the statement is illogical

no its not

i learned about medical examination

there is no single set of symptoms for all poisons

did i say that?????

there is no symptom unique to poison

i said many times you cant tell which one it is

there is some math involved you know???

no, but that is what would be neccecary to make the statement work

as in theres no other explanation

some poison attacks the blood, some attacks the nervous system

other than poisoning

some attack organs

ya and if it attacks the nervous system you still do a blodd test

testing gear, hospital staff operating the tests, and any defects in the quality of the sample can effect the tests

if it attacks circulatory system you do a blood test too

there is a VAST difference between the symptoms of a snake bite and those of touching the wrong frog

or inhaling co2

if u can say it was poison, you have to be able to say something about what kind of poison it was

u cant have one without the other

ya there are, and medical examiners have lots of ways to finsd out if youve been poisoned. I already said before they dont always know which one exactly

and rarely

but being able to tell if youve been poisoned at all

very easy'

and it was illogical bullshit before

bleezer, i think he's trying to explain that there are physical symptoms beyond just 'blood tests' that can explain things

no you dont

its an anomoly

in blood tests

horseshit, not without having a sense of which poison or type it is

and when you rule out all other causes

pretty easy to do

in fucking possible

no its not lmao

and how do you rule out other causes?

but all you do is argue so

by finding the god damn poison

why stay here

with all knowing davey