Message from @Thoutzan
Discord ID: 609113683498500109
by asking these questions tho, I feel that you are implying you make certain assumptions, take certain beliefs, maybe partially, out of need for comfort, not 100% on logic and reality ?
i base my 'faith' on what i know
Q has proven his connection to trump
isnt that belief, not faith davey?
to me that implies a few things:
call it what you will
1: it implies there is a plan
crap my guests arrive, lol l8rz o/
ttyl
i like you am kinda like... "errrr i dont know whats going to happen and either way i'll live but it would sure be nice!" with this whole thing @Thoutzan
all those other terms for that want are ways to help remind people to keep it together and dont fall apart
mostly true but I don't have the "it would sure be nice " part.
And no, i don't have faith in anything or do I trust anything without reasons
back to one of the many questions : if the good SA prince is holding his brother's share of twitter now, why twitter is till a pcs of crap ? SA not fully cleaned ? what do you guys think
when ppl that own a co sell their share of the co, do they still control it..or is it all an illusion
why sell it then ? why not use that share's influence on twitter to help the course ? At least lift the shadowbans right ?
If you knew a ship was going to sink, and you could sell the ship before you had to make any repairs... Would you?
I won't sell the ship that 1. didn't sink in last two years 2. is my ally Trump's biggest channel to communicate with his voters 3. can easily be made into a shinning beacon of free speech without cost a dime
just lift the shadownban on Trump, Trump followers and convervatives
that will be the true "GREAT" awakening platform, not one backwater corner of internet, to another backwater corner of internet.
So my own conclusion is : he doesn't care.
now if he doesn't care, does Trump care ?
when u run a co that was original funded as a darpa/dod project...(every tech that sets up shop in silicon valley gets funded via darpa/dod incase u didn't know, since they own the area)
do u think they actually 'own' it
when they get reminded of that fact
i won't expect them change twitter overnight or own it
but at least do something about it. instead, twitter is getting worse and worse
fb has the same problem
so does google and yt
too many bad apples, better pick a new batch imo
so they are either incompetent, or not very excited about it
and after two years what batch have we picked ?
scattered among many websites
and echo chamber discords
they've been to the secret tribunals ...they're selling out to pay back the tax payers before final judgement comes upon them
again, its "secret" and you have no idea what really happened, have you ?
when it comes under 'new ownership' ...which in reality is the old ownership...the american taxpayers
then those platforms get rebuilt to usa bill of rights standards
but for the time being according to the plan...ppl must learn to hate the 'famous owners'
with 2nd biggest share on twitter, you wouldn't expect lifting a shadowban on a POTUS would be that hard, would you ? but no, not gonna do a thing, I am going to build a perfect new platform in 20 years ? Because that's part of the plan?