i'm on at least a dozen other servers...some nsfw ...but we do talk about things in the open most of the time..some of them req sauce(source info) on research content while others just talk freely in the open because most of the time everybody has seen those bits of sauce

those that ask for the sauce either forgot or never heard of the concepts

when the chans ask for the sauce, they're using a star trek reference(imho at least)...because u can't have the goose without the sauce...the odds must even out with the theory/narrative ur trying to talk about

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diM_XD--F2o

still, i don't get it, why not lift the shadowban, on Trump 😂

but thanks @Desimated @SirW00f and @TrumpQAnon, you response are very valuable for me to assess my ... hmmm... assassments...
I will post my other queries, given enough cool down

keep on keeping on Skeptic

just a reminder that we are all individuals, we speak only on our own personal perspectives and at no level do we speak for a whole group or multiple individuals.

i know, but few researches are not conducted on samples. generalization is needed

true, but make sure you are getting a large sample size

no need really, my assessment is just : "can other active q followers provide plausible answer to this question Y/N" etc.

back

what i miss?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/521987221222457365/609129040116318232/image0.png

xD

nice one, put it in meme aswell

😆 Great Job

lol

Thanks @Thoutzan

lol why are you thanking them @TrumpQAnon

Skeptic kunToday at 3:42 PM
still, i don't get it, why not lift the shadowban, on Trump 😂
but thanks @Desimated @Libtardious Maximus and @TrumpQAnon, you response are very valuable for me to assess my ... hmmm... assassments...
I will post my other queries, given enough cool down

Thanks for confirming

YW

@Thoutzan
https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1159568549645574144?s=20

you'ed never get that kind of review if a strong arm fix occured, the issue would just be masked

never ? you sure ?

here let me fix that for you "i highly doubt you would get a review of code for a major website if issues where not evident due to strong arm corrections as the issues of bias would be masked"

wonder if myspace ever had their code reviewed

by a government body 😛

lol

https://www.npr.org/2019/08/08/693598382/ex-deputy-fbi-director-andrew-mccabe-sues-over-what-he-calls-wrongful-firing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBByXPlEtng

(canada)

its an interesting video, you can see how propaganda can work in both ways, positive messaging with hidden intent, and speaking with intent to create division... good watch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dS3ubI47nZ4

@DaveyJones , just realized another thing :
"guns don't influence people to kill people, people kill people" = "trump doesn't influence people to kill people, people kill people"

if someone playing video games that they kill people in for hours a day, yet they dont impact the person... how could one person create that same reaction by a few tweets?

because we all unique

some peoples uniqueness include a propensity for this type of influence

not saying ir right for this reaction to happen