From head to do, mouth to anus.

But you can still get infections.

But if don't have bacteria, you can get sick.

So, the solution to that is not "no bacteria" it's "unconquerable quantities of good bacteria where they belong"

ah

You don't want e. coli outside of your lower digestive tract.

so you view it as padding the numbers of "good" bacteria to keep the body (my guess is the collective of the human race) in good health

And you especially don't want basic herpes getting into your brain or it goes from cold sore to viral meningitis.

Yes!

So that is why the best thing a normie can do is produce many quality, competent, independent adults.

i would agree with that

tbh i would like a license to breed

because WAAAAAAAYYYYYYYY too many idiots pop out children that pop out more idiots

No one would cooperate. Plus, it's practically unenforceable.

i know, doesn't mean i can't wish for it

I used to think the same.

I still do.

it's like most good ideas, it only works if the collective wills it, and because the collective is full of idiots you have to idiot proof everything

and you can't idiot proof everything

lol

No, see, that is the critical mistake smart people make.

"you have to idiot-proof everything"

That line of thought is 100% wrong.

expand on that

You very specifically do not idiot proof *anything*

Violating that is disgenic.

let it filter out naturally?

You are protecting idiots from nature.

Now, not everyone pays the cost directly.

Sometimes the toddler drinks the bleach.

yep

Sad, but that doesn't merit *requiring* safety caps and locks on cabinets and whatnot.

That said, the smart parents should learn from the mistakes of idiots and maybe take the liberty of either buying the ones that do have the caps or installing childproof latches.

As in makig it a law?

Yes.

Ahh

Yeah i agree

Govt telling you what to do is a downhill slope

i was talking more in the social policy department i.e. creating a breeding license to keep the naturally gifted more in stock, but creating of that social policy would be ignored by the overall

And, as a parallel, we can't go around guaranteeing someone *else* is liable for someone's bad/reckless decisions.

I would say, do it the other way around.