i think youre discrediting how complicated the HRE was

Churchill let millions of indians starve to death in famines while diverting food to other nations

how did they loot your people?

yeah true

but over the larger course of the empire, the living conditions improved in italy

Hundreds of years of loot and pillage, and they reduced india to a poor nation

Italy is entirely different

church hill did starve your people to keep the empire together while fighting the Axis. I sympathize but the british improved your economic state

Indians were considered subhumans

> church hill did starve your people to keep the empire together while fighting the Axis. I sympathize but the british are improved your economic state
@RandomDiscordAccount lmao no there was no reason not to, the british granaries were overflowing with food

And he kept creating buffer stocks while indians starved to death

@Deleted User im saying he starved the people to prevent rebellion in india

Even the british pleaded to him to let some food in india

thats why i said "to keep the empire together"

No that's not the reason

The british brought western dignity culture to india breaking down the caste system present in much of the north

It was pure idiocy, he didn't value indian lives

as well as common law

yeah, he starved your people to prevent rebellion because he wanted to maintain the empire rather than give your people self determination

i sympathize

They did some good things, but in the end they are the reason for ondia's downfall

i disagree with that

ultimately i think the west just grew in power while india stagnated

and that leads to your declining power on the global stage

Not declining

industrialization was brought to india by the british

The global scenario is changing again

yeah, india is becoming muslim and china is exerting soft power

India is one of the fastest dveloping countries, and is projected to become a superpower

Lmao india and muslim?

When did that happen?

"Islam is the fastest-growing religion in India. Growth rate of Muslims has been consistently higher than the growth rate of Hindus, ever since the census data of independent India has been available. For example, during the 1991-2001 decade, Muslim growth rate was 29.5% (vs 19.9% for Hindus)."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_population_growth

that may be true

unless Hindus become more militant than youll just see islam increase

But india is still predominantly hindu and will be so for a long time

> unless Hindus become more militant than youll just see islam increase
@RandomDiscordAccount don't you keep in touch with the news?

i know theyve had a recent conservative in power

that banned the replacement of hindu temples

and banned the slaughter of cattle

but still