Had the brirish not looted india, the global scenario would be much different

The infrastructure is a direct result of colonisation

bro, there is no global power house prior to industrialization.

theres just different regional powers

And lmao do countries like USA even have a culture? 🤣

spain was the first true global power

not much of culture imo concerning the usa

Man it is universally agreed that india was one of the richest countries fir a long time

Maybe look it up before pulling things out of your ass?

India wasnt even a country for that majority of its history

it was feudal holdings competing for power

When i say india i mean the region that is now india

It was a prosperous one

you cant equate a region to a country

its like me equation modern day europe to rome

its disingenuous

That region was unified by a common culture, language and customs

India has entirely different conditions from europe, it's much more complicated

And btw we were talking about culture

no it wasnt, there were wars between muslim and hindu, north and south, those of the plains and those of the mountains

And culturally, objectively speaking, india has one of the richest cultures all over the world

Wars happen everywhere

bro, the holy roman empire is complicated as it gets when it comes to complication

Doesn't discredit what i said

the point is you cant just argue with this pan hindu identity unless you accept the fact that it was the british who created an actual nation for it

India is as complicated as it gets, you don't have an inkling about indian history and culture

The brirish united the kingdoms and then looted our people

i think youre discrediting how complicated the HRE was

Churchill let millions of indians starve to death in famines while diverting food to other nations

how did they loot your people?

yeah true

but over the larger course of the empire, the living conditions improved in italy

Hundreds of years of loot and pillage, and they reduced india to a poor nation

Italy is entirely different

church hill did starve your people to keep the empire together while fighting the Axis. I sympathize but the british improved your economic state

Indians were considered subhumans

> church hill did starve your people to keep the empire together while fighting the Axis. I sympathize but the british are improved your economic state
@RandomDiscordAccount lmao no there was no reason not to, the british granaries were overflowing with food

And he kept creating buffer stocks while indians starved to death

@Deleted User im saying he starved the people to prevent rebellion in india

Even the british pleaded to him to let some food in india

thats why i said "to keep the empire together"