i do if its to keep your native customs imo

India should be neutral and welcoming to all

And it is for the most part

i never agree with neutrality

What do you suggest then?

Why have a nation if not to preserve the native customs?

What do you suggest india should do then if not be neutral?

have a state religion thats takes precedence over others

do what pakistan did with islam

The native customs are not in danger in India

might be difficult due to how diverse the hindu religion is

Religion should be kept away from state affairs

but just officially declare panentheism to be the state religion

It has already caused too much tragedy

No need to do that, you can protect the native customs without crushing down others

how so?

Radical islam is a problem i agree

That's a difficult problem to deal with

Religions have flaws, it is stupid to have a state religion when you have the laws and the constitutional

for someone who dislikes the british, you really do hold a lot of british ideals

why stay true to the anglo sphere and their indoctrination of liberalism?

You are ignorant of indian ideals

And I wouldn't call myself a liberal

i dont think but educate me if i am

That classification is too constrained, I believe in some views that people clasaify as liberal and some that are considered conservative

tell me how rolling over for that which is foreign to your land and allowing them to take advantage of your resources with no benefit to you is an indian ideal?

As opposed to what you may believe, indians weren't cavemen who the british colonised to civilize then

im not saying that

im asking how is there any indian ideal that advocates for neutrality for something foreign that wishes to exert itself over your land?

> tell me how rolling over for that which is foreign to your land and allowing them to take advantage of your resources with no benefit to you is an indian ideal?
@RandomDiscordAccount your alternative of having a state religion doesn't make sense either

whys that? because of the diversity found amongst the hindus?

No, because it would be discriminatory to every other religion, the sikhs, christians, atheists

That's the wrong way to go about doing it

that can be easily dealt with by simply declaring the Brahma to be the one true undivided god and that panentheism is the state of the universe

There are thousands of gods in hinduism you can't just declare one

you need not discriminate against them as much as simply take their taxes to progress your native teachings

all gods are segments of the brahma

The sikhs are native to India too, how are they leeching on us?

just explain it like that ^

sikhs are also panentheistic so they would not be negatively affected by this rule

You can't modify a religion to fit your agenda