Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 704074679564107826


2020-04-26 20:54:41 UTC  

i dont think but educate me if i am

2020-04-26 20:55:20 UTC  

That classification is too constrained, I believe in some views that people clasaify as liberal and some that are considered conservative

2020-04-26 20:55:55 UTC  

tell me how rolling over for that which is foreign to your land and allowing them to take advantage of your resources with no benefit to you is an indian ideal?

2020-04-26 20:56:13 UTC  

As opposed to what you may believe, indians weren't cavemen who the british colonised to civilize then

2020-04-26 20:56:26 UTC  

im not saying that

2020-04-26 20:57:20 UTC  

im asking how is there any indian ideal that advocates for neutrality for something foreign that wishes to exert itself over your land?

2020-04-26 20:57:32 UTC  

> tell me how rolling over for that which is foreign to your land and allowing them to take advantage of your resources with no benefit to you is an indian ideal?
@RandomDiscordAccount your alternative of having a state religion doesn't make sense either

2020-04-26 20:57:55 UTC  

whys that? because of the diversity found amongst the hindus?

2020-04-26 20:58:25 UTC  

No, because it would be discriminatory to every other religion, the sikhs, christians, atheists

2020-04-26 20:58:37 UTC  

That's the wrong way to go about doing it

2020-04-26 20:58:43 UTC  

that can be easily dealt with by simply declaring the Brahma to be the one true undivided god and that panentheism is the state of the universe

2020-04-26 20:59:14 UTC  

There are thousands of gods in hinduism you can't just declare one

2020-04-26 20:59:14 UTC  

you need not discriminate against them as much as simply take their taxes to progress your native teachings

2020-04-26 20:59:24 UTC  

all gods are segments of the brahma

2020-04-26 20:59:57 UTC  

The sikhs are native to India too, how are they leeching on us?

2020-04-26 20:59:59 UTC  

just explain it like that ^

2020-04-26 21:00:20 UTC  

sikhs are also panentheistic so they would not be negatively affected by this rule

2020-04-26 21:00:25 UTC  

You can't modify a religion to fit your agenda

2020-04-26 21:01:06 UTC  

The only religion that may pose a threat is islam

2020-04-26 21:01:07 UTC  

btw, i didnt mean brahma, i meant brahman

2020-04-26 21:01:24 UTC  

Brahman is a caste not a god

2020-04-26 21:01:31 UTC  

ofc we can, empires did it all the time

2020-04-26 21:01:37 UTC  

Brahma is a god

2020-04-26 21:01:41 UTC  

no, the caste is named after the divine aspect

2020-04-26 21:01:48 UTC  

brahma is a segment of the brahman

2020-04-26 21:01:51 UTC  

I know

2020-04-26 21:02:00 UTC  

the brahman is the greater spirit of the universe

2020-04-26 21:02:08 UTC  

...

2020-04-26 21:02:10 UTC  

I know

2020-04-26 21:02:13 UTC  

and brahmin are just a caste named after em

2020-04-26 21:02:19 UTC  

so whats the contention?

2020-04-26 21:02:24 UTC  

And brahma would be the correct term to use

2020-04-26 21:02:39 UTC  

hmm

2020-04-26 21:02:43 UTC  

let me check the wikis

2020-04-26 21:02:57 UTC  

Do you think atheists are not natives either?

2020-04-26 21:03:24 UTC  

Brahman is the universe if that's what you were saying

2020-04-26 21:03:25 UTC  

it would not discriminate against atheists for they have no religion to practice

2020-04-26 21:03:32 UTC  

Bramhan

2020-04-26 21:03:36 UTC  

yeah, the greater spirity of reality

2020-04-26 21:03:54 UTC  

I would translate it to universe

2020-04-26 21:04:01 UTC  

in english we seem to use different spelling to differentiate the caste and the spirit of reality it seems