Why I would need to change that's more of a personal decision

You may not see it, but I stated my criticism of your lifestyle.

The majority

Not me

I don't have 500 partners

Or molested a child

Because it’s harmful for the collective at large.

I'm a 16 year old virgin

Also never done a drug

In my life

Yes the majority is the reason you think like that

Your value derives from being a strong stone in a fortress, and unfortunately this attribute you have is a crack in a stone.

Because I'm an outlier?

The fortress being a metaphor for the collective and the stone being you.

No, there’s nothing wrong with being an outlier, but the effect of your abnormality matters.

People like me are the only way for the majority to change

I see your affect to largely negative.

It takes your own to convince you

I don’t view the LGBT as convincible unfortunately.

Please don't say LGBT like that I'm talking about homosexuality only

We have become too polarised and there is no going back, this even applies to the left/right dialectic.

Transgenderism is wrong

And don't count with us

Same with everything else

Homosexuality is the only justified thing

The gay community can change, if you give us a chance to show you @Carvo

I've told you my criticisms and I've shown you that these are inherent to homosexuality. You cannot get rid of these flaws. The same way you view transgenderism, I view homosexuality.

My advice to you is to remain chaste if you cannot change your orientation. But also know that you can take steps to actually start finding women attractive. Although I know that women's sexuality is much more malleable than men's.

But I commend you for not diving into drugs, I can see that you want to improve for the better. @BabyHenry

How are these issues Intrinsic to homosexuality?

Do I have to show different homosexuals who

Debunked those iss

Issues

Because you cannot have a child in such a relatonship, which makes the dynamic extremely dependant on sex.

Saying that the purpose of sex or orgasm is to have children is technically incorrect. Reproduction is a basic and primary function of sexuality but not an exclusive or necessary one. So all reproductive acts are sexual but not all sexual actions are reproductive. Just because sex has a reproductive function doesn't mean any non reproductive sex is invalid or immoral. For example, the primary purpose of eating food is to survive. However, we also eat food for pleasure, social bonding (family dinner, a date) and other reasons (emotional comfort etc). The existence of a primary purpose for an activity does not mean that this purpose is the exclusive or only valid purpose for it. So sex has both procreative and non procreative functions. Homosexuality is an attraction and by having sex for pleasure isn't necessarily immoral since we all do it.

No reason at all for a homosexual to change

You aren't understanding the criticism. Its the result of such relationships I have contention with, which again is, that the themes homosexuality inherently contains, are not good themes.

If he's happy, and healthy

That would just make you intolerant of them being different

Which would be hatred

At its definition

True homophobia people take stances against