Nor you on an individual level

"Muh reproduction"

BS

Thats just a semantics argument.

Yes, it depends on your definition of normal.

who cares.

and I specifically said that I dont care if people are outliers.

That's literally what normal means, most people use abnormal in contexts of it's number

I care about the impact they have.

And appearance

In history

LOL

And that's why I'm saying the community can change

Normal means conformity to common behaviour.

Because you can't say society will fall because two health, monogamous men are together privately

You have no proof of that

If you aren't ignorant

You'd let homosexuals redeem themselves and take their bargain

If you're looking for a study saying such a thing, then you won't find such a thing. But know that theres a reason why many societies had prejudice against your kind.

Because at the end of the day you're not affected, and if society isn't hurt. You wouldn't have an arguement

But I am affected and it does hurt society.

How are you affected by me?

Lol

Individualism plays a big role in this

Because your issue is pushed onto me

and I dont used the individual as a big metric.

Homosexuality does not hurt society if gays took a different approach

In the world

I am a collectivist. If there is something unpleasant but beneficial to your collective, you should do that.

But again, the dynamic of a homosexual relationship is heavily sexual and you cannot get rid of this.

So is heterosexuality

You can fuck everyday in a heterosexual relationship

That doesn't show how gays hurt society

No, even with a couple who can't have kids, a facade would take its place, and society wouldnt be impacted by this.

Same concept with homosexuality

Nobody looks at a sterile old couple and thinks that its heavily sexual.

they usually think that this couple lived through their lives and are probably grandparents.

Sterile people

With homosexuals, you instantly know that this isn't the case.

Have sex

You just aren't understanding it.