Message from @Carvo
Discord ID: 725470178900574302
He himself said he has no issues with gay people
He even took the time to acknowledge a homosexual piano player
That doesnt mean hes okay with him being homosexual
Im speaking with you right now, doesnt mean I approve of your behaviour.
He said himself he don't have any issues with someone being homosexual aslong as they don't publicize it
Are you okay with this?
Now if Russia population were to be cool with gays while carrying on a civil society
It would be partial on both ends
Not publicising it means not holding hands or kissing in public.
I can do all that in private
want to ask all those tolerant cucks how their tolerance is working out for them
Carvo your arguments aren't strong
You havent argued against my arguments.
You're just against them because they aren't like you
Solely
I have
You essentially say that "yes this is the case but I dont care"
Me not reproducing which is a your peak argument against me, isn't a factor into society falling because gays exists
Small population
Isn't going to overlook 97%
Also take overpopulation into account
Homosexuality would have minimal effect in places like China
Or india
You also stated that society accepting gays would hurt them
But never proved how exactly
Or shown a source
I acknowledge your argument
And I seen the flaw in homosexuality
That I stated I would help ameliorate in the mere future
This isn't a one sided argument
1)Homosexual relationships cannot reproduce
2)This makes homosexual relationships very heavily dependant on sexual acts
3)Homosexuals are very distinguishable in society
4)This causes them to have a lot of cultural ammunition and be a focus point if permitted.
5)The themes deriving from homosexuality is that such a lifestyle is permitted
6)This causes many others especially women to pursue such a lifestyle
7)We dont want such a lifestyle to be widespread and should limit it
Conclusion-Homosexuality is bad and shouldnt be promoted.
This is my argument in a syllogism.
Even if you have a homosexual couple not having sex privately, this would still apply.
There are two levels of morality. One is the level of morality we can legitimately enforce on others and society at large. This level of morality is defined by benevolence, consent and harmlessness. If something is benevolent, doesn't cause harm and doesn't violate consent, we are not justified in regulating that behavior in others.
The second level of morality is that which we hold ourselves to personally. That level of morality is personal or between ourselves and God. This may require a much higher standard of purity or virtue. So homosexuality or furry behavior my violate my (or your) personal moral code and thus you Can and should abstain from that behavior yourself, but you aren't justified in interfering with other adults who do this activity privately.
If i think something is immoral I will do anything what I think is justifiable to stop said immorality.
This doesnt target my argument though.
> 1)Homosexual relationships cannot reproduce
> 2)This makes homosexual relationships very heavily dependant on sexual acts
> 3)Homosexuals are very distinguishable in society
> 4)This causes them to have a lot of cultural ammunition and be a focus point if permitted.
> 5)The themes deriving from homosexuality is that such a lifestyle is permitted
> 6)This causes many others especially women to pursue such a lifestyle
> 7)We dont want such a lifestyle to be widespread and should limit it
> Conclusion-Homosexuality is bad and shouldnt be promoted.
@Carvo you don't need to reproduce to have a happy loving relationship. Infertile people don't reproduce either, neither do hermaphrodites. Homosexuals being known their gay isn't necessarily a harm, for the most part being civil and productive would not make someone think you're gay the 1st time. And you have no proof of gays hurting society if people see they do things differently, that only establishes that heterosexuals are puppets that are controlled by homosexuality and how they perform. That isn't the case and you have no proof of that happening. "We don't want a lifestyle to be widespread" homosexuality would never be widespread if people didn't promote it, but based on history gay people still existed in masses overtime. They're gonna exist either way.