I can give you allll the reports that'll slap you in the face with the facts and figures of how many foreigners just come here for free money to send back to their own countries

Everywhere we go is understaffed, so it's okay right, oh, a couple more thousand people in company X lost their jobs today because of a cut in funding........

that go to the aliens that come here

We definitely need much better rules on immigration

Stricter, not just take every tom dick harry and his homeless friend amar

ill like those reports

Was afk for a bit

> Most of them literally sit on their arse on state benefits all day
@NotJesus

How do you know what 'most' are doing? Are you basing this on statistical data?

https://youtu.be/3glyQwacfwM

Yeah just plain and simple fact, you see more foreigners in job centres, or on the streets selling drugs, or working cash in hand jobs, paying no tax

@WhiteTrashWorkhorse

ping ping

@mamiblue

@mamiblue

@mamiblue

@mamiblue

@mamiblue

@mamiblue

@mamiblue

@mamiblue

Get him told

partnership @WhiteTrashWorkhorse

oh yeah ofc mate

dm me if you got an inv + pasta

ill send u ours

> Yeah just plain and simple fact, you see more foreigners in job centres, or on the streets selling drugs, or working cash in hand jobs, paying no tax
@NotJesus

You sound like a myopic bigot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G42fK6gMw98

invite more schizos

https://youtu.be/j_op2cucu7Y

https://www.scribd.com/document/469891659/Intelligence-and-Security-Committee-of-Parliament-Russia#download&from_embed

UK report on Russian interference in the West

For anyone who watches this video, Slate Star Codex is a tech blog mostly. He writes about science, tech, the environment and sometimes politics where he goes into details. He is not someone that is far right at all. He has a wide range of readers who are far-left, far right, in the middle and everything else.

New York Times contacted the blog owner (Scott), wanting to write a story on his blog about how he had "got some things about coronavirus right early on". Basically claiming it was going to be a good story on the blog. Then the journalist told Scott that he had found out his real name and was going to put it in the story. Scott said he wished for anonymity for plenty of good reasons and the NYT journalist said "New York Times policy to include real names, and he couldn’t change that."

From what I've saw, NYT picks and chooses whos real names they put in their stories. There have been plenty where they do not discuss the individuals names and there have been plenty where they openly doxx an individual. This must either be a new rule or they are lying. In my honest opinion, and not falling to far into conspiracy theory territory they wanted to doxx Scott because while his blog is more of a center leaning blog he has still been critical of the Social Justice movement (such as their bullying tactics), culture war etc. He has brought up IQ differences. He also allows anyone to comment as long as they follow the rules so that his blog doesn't become an echo-chamber. He has received death threats over this so it's clear there are people that have issue with it. Scott himself has mentioned in his blog being silenced a few times from fear of some of these threats. I think NYT has taken issue as well with him, and are using this "good story" excuse as a way to doxx him because his blog is very popular.