Message from @Lᵃʷ ᵂʳᵉⁿ

Discord ID: 782286563970646019


2020-11-28 16:11:48 UTC  

doesn't exactly scream confidence

2020-11-28 16:12:04 UTC  

I'm not looking for nostradamus, but I don't like the weak tea commentary

2020-11-28 16:12:09 UTC  

Yea exactly

2020-11-28 16:12:59 UTC  

Id be more inclined to listen to him if he took the critical position and defended it strongly. I'd find more value in that

2020-11-28 16:14:14 UTC  

i pretty much put most of my trust in mike adams, and AJ.. gatewaypundit..etc

2020-11-28 16:18:01 UTC  

I don't trust anything unless I've seen enough data that the position logically follows. That's why I like to see as many sources as possible. But I respect Jim hoft (gatewaypundit), and I can tolerate aj though he goes off the deep end regularly. It's more personality related than anything imo so it's not a big deal. Your boy Mike Adams is relatively new to me, I won't know what I think of his points until some of this plays out further

2020-11-28 16:18:42 UTC  

copy that..

2020-11-28 16:24:23 UTC  

What's a bit frustrating is how natural news and gateway pundit get smeared even though they've been supporting valid positions for a long time and they're not even out there like iw. Tim poole mentioned "I know gatewaypundit isn't the best source" or something to that effect once and I didn't know about the site at the time. I initially had this tabloidesque rag in mind, just because the popular mythology was repeated. Supression is so subversive.

2020-11-28 16:26:46 UTC  

it's our job at this point to filter out the double agent lies.. with so much information it's almost impossible

2020-11-28 16:28:09 UTC  

It's an undertaking, to be sure. Somebody's gotta do it though. There are too many people still asleep, they're not after the truth, though they need it.

2020-11-28 16:30:21 UTC  

And I may be naive in this but I tend to err on the side of believing people are as uninformed as anyone else, even if they are citizen journalists. I don't tend to think they're double agents or intentionally misleading anyone. They have to sift through all the same information we do. I just think they're people.

2020-11-28 16:31:36 UTC  

well, they know the info, the issue is, they become pressured/ corrupted.. and twist the information

2020-11-28 16:31:47 UTC  

Maybe so

2020-11-28 16:33:22 UTC  

I can see it happening based on their own self-interest more than external influences. Like pandering for likes and subscriptions. But I'm sure it's happening as you describe

2020-11-28 16:34:15 UTC  

for example.. I published an article on chemtrails.. asked my local newspaper director to post it... after reading it, she called me a loony, no way she was going to publish that.. even though there is clear evidence of chemtrails, she was biased? perhaps ordered to not publish anything relating to government programs?

2020-11-28 16:38:23 UTC  

See even in that situation I see a person who has been just as convinced by the media as anyone else. Chemtrails have been a disputed topic for a long time and the vast majority of people don't subscribe to the position you might hold. Even when presented with the evidence, people are locked into a worldview and discordant information confronts that and threatens to disregulate it. I just think that director thinks you're a loony because most people would also think you're a loony. People are asleep. The powers that be don't have to tell anyone to ignore the truth, they're already programmed to do that.

2020-11-28 16:39:45 UTC  

true. they aren't worried about truth now, cause people won't believe it even when it's in their face these days..

2020-11-28 16:42:11 UTC  

Yea, I mean if you already think you have it it's far easier to be ignorant of it when it's presented to you. No sense in rocking the boat. Imagine how your world would necessarily have to collapse of you let in a little bit of destruction. Truth hits the foundation, there's no going back once you start the demolition.

2020-11-28 16:42:59 UTC  

perhaps nov.3rd was the tipping point?

2020-11-28 16:46:18 UTC  

I think for some, yes. There are still people who are not willing to stand up because they're banking on Trump standing up for them and I would argue that's the more dangerous of the positions between asleep and awake. It's all well and good to appreciate the President and want to see justice done but it has long since been time to stand up and take back what we, in ignorance, handed over to the government

2020-11-28 16:47:31 UTC  

I don't blame the people who are mesmerized by the machine, the people who are aware of what's going on and still holding out for Trump to save them are the ones who need a swift kick in the pants

2020-11-28 16:47:53 UTC  

lol.. indeed

2020-11-28 20:35:10 UTC  

you beat me @red , I was going to post the situation report for the 28th.. nice one.. great minds...

2020-11-28 21:42:52 UTC  

This was really good

2020-11-28 22:09:27 UTC  

glad you listened.. thought it was informative

2020-11-28 22:10:32 UTC  

I liked monkey werx style of presenting the facts, really straight forward and easily understandable

2020-11-28 22:10:50 UTC  

good deal

2020-11-28 22:12:01 UTC  

It kind of makes everything seem so theatrical. If you really think about it, the interviews and the articles all seem superficial now

2020-11-28 22:57:42 UTC  

Remember this?