Because you sound as if all the things the scientific community says is 100% factual, those things could never change based upon greater technology or more information.

you sound like you are unwilling to believe anything no matter what eveidence is presented

I never said things can't change... but not ALL things

I'll have to rejoin this lovely conversation after work. I get off in an hour, sorry guys!

there are some things, that we now know are FACTS..

I never said that. I haven't said what I personally believe about individual things, I'm making general statements about thought and scientific processes, independently of what I personally believe about a specific subject.

it is a FACT that the genetic material that chooses the sex of a child is from the father. We have identified the chomosomes involved. The chomosomes are the smallest thing there is on that score.

that science is settled...

Also, when I type 1 single messages, you've typed 5 or 6, so then the thoughts get so intermingled it's more difficult to expound on what both of us are saying

OK... then I would ask you to watch the show I liked above

Which I can do.

then we should talk about intelligence in animals

Now that that is out of the way.....................

But you also have to send me whatever studies you got your information from

Even chromosomes could be examined in a greater way with future technology, you just can't know.

otherwise I am at a disadvantage

The science of how chomosomes determing out genetic makeup is a settled science. We can study dofferent ones, and how they make us who we are. But that's all

We can study how damage to them can damage us... but that is all

Wasn't it settled at some point that the Earth was flat, or the center of the universe ?

there is nothing other than chomosomes that determine the geneticmakeup of a lifeform

That is a different science and not relevant here

We used to say it was settled science that the atom was the smallest particle.

and there are still morons that think the earth is flat.

Funnily enough, the flat-Earth movement is actually growing, lol.

Yes... we know that there are smaller particles... but at some point you DO get to pretty much the smallest one

then all you can do is study how they interact

Yeah... don't even get me started on the flat earthers!! LOL

That one is another example of the dumbing down of our educational system!

Dude, lol

There is no "some point" where the science on a matter stops and can never change.

And BTW... the smallest particles we know of are quarks... but we have known about them for a long time

They said the exact same thing about atoms.

It was a long time between atoms and quarks in terms of discovery though.

It wasn't like a few years

yes there is... it is the point at which you no longer have the ability to see the thing in question or it would be too small to exist

We have knows about quarks for at least 50 years

You can't think outside the box on something smaller than a quark ?

If a microscope is invented that can see smaller than a quark, then why not ?

Quarks are pretty frigging small... LOL.

So are atoms