Well, not necessarily actual Democrat, he said he voted for both parties before, and so have I, doesn't make me an actual Democrat, lol.

If you look at his past history and who he's donated and voted for, it's never been for a Republican

I don't know who's been saying that he votes for both parties but that's not true at all

Plus he's a bit extreme, didn't he tell everybody not to vote in the Senate race?

Yeah I don't know how to take Lin Wood. I'm taking somethings from him with a Grain Of Salt.. The only People I'm keeping a close eye on are General Flynn, Rudy, and Sydney.

What about people like Vernon Jones who is definitely on our side. He's been a life-long Democrat.

He never voted Republican

I really only pay attention to the people who had the same morals and values as I do, I understand why people want to leave the Democratic party but if you're not going to change your values you're really not making any difference

I'm a Christian conservative Republican in that order, just like Mike pence said

Oh yeah man, I heard Pence say that in every rally I saw of his in 2016

It's a good order

Yeah I like the statement so much that I ended up stealing it from my own 😅

You pulled a Biden.

Nooooo, I have Mike pence credit for the statement! Never claimed to be mine! 😛

I'm not even for certain how the Supreme Court will rule

No one is.

If even the 5/6 conservative judges aren't bought off, cuz I don't think they are, that doesn't mean they're gonna rule in our favor, even Trump said that when he was picking her.

Being a textualist doesn't mean always siding with conservative viewpoints.

We've really never been in this situation before.

You're right, buy given we know she is a Godly women, we can have faith she will make the right choice

Even conservative judges haven't been in this situation being just a few days before Electoral College.

Even if it isn't what we want

But to a certain extent she also has to separate her faith and personal viewpoints from her job as a judge

To judge the law as written, not as preferred.

That can come with a sting sometimes when it wouldn't be in our favour..

Yeah, we just have to hope there is enough evidence

Pray & keep faith

But if this kind of issue is ruled that it should remain in state court, that's why they might rule that way

Even if the evidence proves it.

But at the end of the day, they are judges and can rule how they want.

So they could just trump that thought-process and rule to throw out the election

Yeah, that's why it's good Trump put 300+ judges in courts

Elections have been put aside before due to fraud

I'm not sure if the Supreme Court did or if it was a lower court.

I don't know a lot about the courts, learning as move along this process

One big worry I have is that if the conservative justices, even the ones Trump appointed, rule against us, most conservatives will assume that they were bought off or are not real conservatives.

Because that's not necessarily true.

Yeah, speculations will fly, they always do. Look at John Robert's. The difference between us and the left side is that we don't take action we just make speculations until otherwise proven

For instance, even though I'm against gay marriage, I don't think the Supreme Court was necessarily wrong in it's decision in June 2015, Constitutionally speaking. The Equal Protections Clause has to give equal protections and rights to all, so you can't have marriage benefits for some and not for others. The shady issue becomes the definition of marriage, so it's a decision that could go either way, it's not as open-and-shut of a case as most conservatives would think.